Chapter 10: Corporate Governance 339
- L. R. Gomez-Mejia, J. T. Campbell, G.
Martin, R. E. Hoskisson, M. Makri, & D. G.
Sirmon, 2014, Socioemotional wealth as a
mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D
investments with the behavioral agency
model, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice,
38: 1351–1374; A. Konig, N. Kammerlander, &
A. Enders, 2013, The family innovator’s
dilemma: How family influence affects the
adoption of discontinuous technologies by
incumbent firms, Academy of Management
Review, 38: 418–441; J. J. Chrisman & P. C.
Patel, 2012, Variations in R&D investments
of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral
agency and myopic loss aversion
perspectives, Academy of Management
Journal, 55: 976–997. - A. Berle & G. Means, 1932, The Modern
Corporation and Private Property, NY:
Macmillan. - M. Wang, 2014, Which types of institutional
investors constrain abnormal accruals?,
Corporate Governance: An International
Review, 22: 43–67; R. A. Johnson,
K. Schnatterly, S. G. Johnson, &
S.-C. Chiu, 2010, Institutional investors
and institutional environment: A
comparative analysis and review, Journal of
Management Studies, 47: 1590–1613;
M. Gietzmann, 2006, Disclosure of
timely and forward-looking statements
and strategic management of major
institutional ownership, Long Range
Planning, 39: 409–427. - D. Marchick, 2011, Testimony of David
Marchick—The power of pensions:
Building a strong middle class and a strong
economy, The Carlyle Group homepage,
http://www.carlyle.com, July 12. - J. Chou, L. Ng, V. Sibilkov, & Q. Wang, 2011,
Product market competition and corporate
governance, Review of Development Finance,
1: 114–130; S. D. Chowdhury & E. Z. Wang,
2009, Institutional activism types and CEO
compensation: A time-series analysis of
large Canadian corporations, Journal of
Management, 35: 5–36. - R. Krause, K. A. Whitler, & M. Semadeni,
2014, Power to the principals! An
experimental look at shareholder say-
on-pay voting, Academy of Management
Journal, 57: 94–115; Y. Ertimur, F. Ferri, &
S. R. Stubben, 2010, Board of directors’
responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence
from shareholder proposals, Journal of
Corporate Finance, 16: 53–72. - C. Mallin, 2012, Institutional investors: the
vote as a tool of governance, Journal of
Management & Governance, 16: 177–196;
D. Brewster, 2009, U.S. investors get to
nominate boards, Financial Times, http://www.
ft.com, May 20. - S. Craig, 2013, The giant of shareholders,
quietly stirring, New York Times, http://www.
nytimes.com, May 18. - 2015, BlackRock’s Fink tells S&P 500 firms
to think long-term, Fortune, http://www.fortune.
com, April 29
62. X. Liu, D. D. van Jaarsveld, R. Batt, &
A. C. Frost, 2014, The influence of capital
structure on strategic human capital:
Evidence from U.S. And Canadian firms.
Journal of Management, 40: 422–448;
M. Hadani, M. Goranova, & R. Khan, 2011,
Institutional investors, shareholder activism,
and earnings management, Journal of
Business Research, 64: 1352–1360; L. Tihanyi,
R. A. Johnson, R. E. Hoskisson, & M. A. Hitt,
2003, Institutional ownership differences
and international diversification: The
effects of boards of directors and
technological opportunity, Academy of
Management Journal, 46: 195–211.
63. M. L. Heyden, J. Oehmichen, S. Nichting, &
H. W. Volberda, 2015, Board background
heterogeneity and exploration-
exploitation: The role of the institutionally
adopted board model, Global Strategy
Journal, 5: 154–176; S. Garg, 2013, Venture
boards: Differences with public boards
and implications for monitoring and firm
performance, Academy of Management
Review, 38: 90–108; O. Faleye, R. Hoitash, &
U. Hoitash, 2011, The costs of intense board
monitoring, Journal of Financial Economics,
101: 160–181.
64. D. Barton & M. Wiseman, 2015, Where
boards fall short, Harvard Business
Review, 93(1/2): 98–104; J. T. Campbell,
T. C. Campbell, D. G. Sirmon, L. Bierman, &
C. S. Tuggle, 2012, Shareholder influence
over director nomination via proxy access:
Implications for agency conflict and
stakeholder value, Strategic Management
Journal, 33: 1431–1451; C. M. Dalton &
D. R. Dalton 2006, Corporate governance
best practices: The proof is in the process,
Journal of Business Strategy, 27(4): 5–7.
65. A. Tushke, W. G. Sanders, & E. Hernandez,
2014, Whose experience matters in the
boardroom? The effects of experiential and
vicarious learning on emerging market
entry, Strategic Management Journal,
35: 398–418; T. Dalziel, R. J. Gentry, &
M. Bowerman, 2011, An integrated agency-
resource dependence view of the influence
of directors’ human and relational capital
on firms’ R&D spending, Journal of
Management Studies, 48: 1217–1242.
66. P. Khanna, C. D. Jones, & S. Boivie, 2014,
Director human capital, information
processing demands, and board
effectiveness, Journal of Management, 40:
557–585; O. Faleye, 2011, CEO directors,
executive incentives, and corporate
strategic initiatives, Journal of Financial
Research, 34: 241–277; C. S. Tuggle, D.
G. Sirmon, C. R. Reutzel, & L. Bierman,
2010, Commanding board of director
attention: Investigating how organizational
performance and CEO duality affect
board members’ attention to monitoring,
Strategic Management Journal, 31: 946–968.
67. C. Sundaramurthy, K. Pukthuanthong, &
Y. Kor, 2014, Positive and negative
synergies between the CEO’s and the
corporate board’s human and social
capital: A study of biotechnology firms,
Strategic Management Journal, 35:
845–868; S. Chahine, I. Filatotchev, &
S. A. Zahra, 2011, Building perceived
quality of founder-involved IPO firms:
Founders’ effects on board selection
and stock market performance,
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
35: 319–335; Y. Ertimur, F. Ferri, &
S. R. Stubben, 2010, Board of directors’
responsiveness to shareholders: Evidence
from shareholder proposals, Journal of
Corporate Finance, 16: 53–72.- E. Peni, 2014, CEO and Chairperson
characteristics and firm performance,
Journal of Management & Governance, 18:
185–205; M. A. Valenti, R. Luce, & C. Mayfield,
2011, The effects of firm performance
on corporate governance, Management
Research Review, 34: 266–283; D. Reeb &
A. Upadhyay, 2010, Subordinate board
structures, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16:
469–486. - A. D. Upadhyay, R. Bhargava, & S. D.
Faircloth, 2014, Board structure and role of
monitoring committees, Journal of Business
Research, 67: 1486–1492; B. Bolton, 2014,
Audit committee performance: ownership
vs. independence—Did SOX get it wrong?,
Accounting & Finance, 54: 83–112. - D. H. Zhu, W. Shen, & A. J. Hillman, 2014,
Recategorization into the in-group:
The appointment of demographically
different new directors and their
subsequent positions on corporate boards,
Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 240–270;
A. Holehonnur & T. Pollock, 2013, Shoot
for the stars? Predicting the recruitment
of prestigious directors at newly public
firms, Academy of Management Journal, 56:
1396–1419; M. McDonald & J. Westphal, 2013,
Access denied: Low mentoring of women
and minority first-time directors and its
negative effects on appointments to
additional boards, Academy of Management
Journal, 56: 1169–1198. - Joseph, Ocasio, & McDonnell, The structural
elaboration of board independence:
Executive power, institutional logics,
and the adoption of CEO-only board
structures in U.S. corporate governance;
R. C. Anderson, D. M. Reeb, A. Upadhyay, &
W. Zhao, 2011, The economics of director
heterogeneity, Financial Management,
40: 5–38; S. K. Lee & L. R. Carlson, 2007,
The changing board of directors: Board
independence in S&P 500 firms, Journal of
Organizational Culture, Communication and
Conflict, 11: 31–41. - R. Krause, M. Semadeni, & A. A. Cannella,
2014, CEO Duality: A review and research
agenda, Journal of Management, 40: 256–286;
S. Crainer, 2011, Changing direction: One
person can make a difference, Business
Strategy Review, 22: 10–16; R. C. Pozen, 2006,
Before you split that CEO/chair, Harvard
Business Review 84(4): 26–28.