The Wall Street Journal - 11.09.2019

(Steven Felgate) #1

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Wednesday, September 11, 2019 |A


A screen in Seoul shows footage of a North Korean missile launch.

JUNG YEON-JE/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

KABUL—President Trump’s
decision to cancel a U.S.-Tali-
ban deal and end negotiations
effectively hands Afghan Pres-
ident Ashraf Ghani the control
he has long craved over a
peace process from which he
had been excluded.
Mr. Ghani, a renowned mi-
cromanager who presents
himself as history’s answer to
Afghanistan’s problems, is now
where he insisted he should
have been from the start: in
the driver’s seat of efforts to
end his country’s nearly 18-
year war.
“Things have changed now,”
he told members of the Afghan
security forces in a speech
Monday in the presidential
palace, with the satisfied air
of a man vindicated by recent
events. “We are ready for
peace talks, but if the Taliban
think they can scare us, look
at these warriors.”
Mr. Ghani’s victory-by-de-
fault in his struggle to oversee
the Afghan peace process puts
him more comfortably in
power than at any time since
the U.S. resumed direct talks
with the Taliban more than a
year ago.
The threat has vanished of
a peace process that could
have dashed Mr. Ghani’s ambi-
tions for a second five-year
term by forming an interim
administration. By breaking
off the negotiations, Mr.
Trump has effectively cleared
the path for Mr. Ghani to win
presidential elections sched-
uled for Sept. 28.
The burden now falls on the
Afghan technocrat, a former
World Bank and United Na-
tions official, to produce a
comprehensive settlement in a
war that, with the collapse of
the U.S.-Taliban negotiating
channel, is expected to turn
bloodier.
“His government is openly
celebrating the setback in
talks,” said Laurel Miller, di-
rector of the International Cri-
sis Group’s Asia program. “But
he now faces the challenge of
showing he can come up with
a plan for peace that reflects
the real situation on the
ground and that can win the
support of all of the country’s
anti-Taliban forces.”
Mr. Ghani has disclosed no
details of his plans to take
charge of the peace process.
On Monday, he called for a
cease-fire before any talks, a
position the Taliban have re-
peatedly rejected.
The two factors that led the
Trump administration in June
2018 to order a resumption of
direct U.S.-Taliban talks ha-
ven’t changed: a stalemate in
the war and the Taliban’s in-
sistence on settling business
with the U.S. first.
Also unchanged is the date
of U.S. presidential elections,
by which time Mr. Trump has
hoped to bring home a sub-
stantial number of the 14,
U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
The now-scrapped deal


reached by U.S. and Taliban
negotiators was to have ush-
ered in talks between the Tali-
ban and an Afghan delegation
that included government offi-
cials. Those talks would decide
on a permanent cease-fire and
how the country would be
ruled.
Unless the Taliban take the
unlikely step of changing their
U.S.-first position on talks, a
reboot of the U.S.-Taliban
talks is essential for restarting
the process, Ms. Miller and
other experts said Tuesday.
“Alternatively, it’s possible
that the U.S. will just draw
down its troops, the war will
go on, and ultimately Afghani-
stan will be left to its fate,”
said Ms. Miller, a former se-
nior U.S. diplomat for Afghani-
stan and Pakistan.
In his efforts to insert his
government into the peace
process, Mr. Ghani, 70 years
old, used the institutional and

organizational savvy he
amassed in previous roles.
Yet the Taliban proved im-
movable. The hard-line Isla-
mist militia has long refused
to speak directly to any Kabul
administration, which they
view as an American pawn.
None of the Afghan presi-
dent’s myriad committees, de-
tailed flowcharts and diplo-
matic maneuvering succeeded
in winning a seat at the nego-
tiating table.
Then, following an attack in
Kabul that killed 12 people, in-
cluding a U.S. soldier, Mr.
Trump dumped the U.S.-Tali-
ban deal, which awaited only
his signature.
On Monday, he declared the
talks dead.
Some members of the presi-
dent’s administration had op-
posed the Taliban talks, in-
cluding Mr. Trump’s national
security adviser, John Bolton,
who has said Mr. Trump could

draw down troops in Afghani-
stan without a deal. Mr.
Trump dismissed Mr. Bolton
on Tuesday.
The demise of the settle-
ment is likely to embolden mi-
nority but influential voices in
the Ghani government who be-
lieve a military victory over
the Taliban is possible, accord-
ing to a Western official in the
Afghan capital who has closely
followed the Doha talks and
other previous Afghan peace
initiatives.
It also weakens the credibil-
ity of the Taliban’s negotiators
in Doha and reinforces the de-
sire of hard-line factions in
the Taliban’s leadership coun-
cil in Pakistan for continued
war, the official said.
Without a quick return to
U.S.-Taliban talks, thousands
more will die, the official
warned.
As preparations for the
Sept. 28 elections accelerate,
the U.S. military hinted that it
is likely to ramp up airstrikes
and raids by Afghan and
American special forces.
With much of the onus now
on Mr. Ghani, he is going to
have to reconsider his demand
for complete government con-
trol of the process and his in-
sistence that the Taliban lay
down their arms before talks,
said Ms. Miller of the Interna-
tional Crisis Group.

‘Things have changed now,’
President Ashraf Ghani told
Afghan security forces who
participated in a ceremony in
Kabul on Monday.

WORLD NEWS


announce after next week’s
vote. Mr. Netanyahu’s vow
thrusts the control of Israeli-
occupied territories squarely
in the spotlight as polls show
him struggling to get enough
seats to win re-election.
The move, if carried out,
would fundamentally challenge
years of international consen-
sus on Israeli-Palestinian
peace by unilaterally asserting
permanent borders that have
long been considered subject
to future negotiations.
At a news conference fea-
turing a map of the Jordan
Valley, Mr. Netanyahu im-
plored Israeli voters to give
him a chance to accomplish a
long-held goal of many Israe-
lis, especially on the right. The
prime minister said the Trump
administration’s likely accep-
tance of such a controversial
move was a once-in-a-century
opportunity.
“I am asking for a clear
mandate,” Mr. Netanyahu said.
“Give me the power to secure
Israel’s security. Give me the
power to set Israel’s borders.”
“We haven’t had such an
opportunity since 1967,” the
prime minister added, refer-
ring to the year when Israel
seized control of the West
Bank during a war with its
Arab neighbors. “And it’s
doubtful for another 50 years.”
It was the second time this
year that the embattled pre-

mier has vowed to annex Is-
rael-controlled parts of the
West Bank if elected. He made
a similar pledge in April, with-
out singling out the Jordan
Valley, before his party won
enough seats to try to form a
governing coalition. Israel was
launched into the current
round of elections after Mr.
Netanyahu failed to bridge
gaps among the smaller secu-
lar and religious parties he

needed to secure a majority.
Saeb Erekat, a senior Pales-
tinian official and lead negoti-
ator with Israelis, said Mr. Ne-
tanyahu’s plan contradicts
international law and would
prolong the conflict.
“We need to end the con-
flict and not to keep it for an-
other 100 years, as Netanyahu
plans. Keep in mind annexa-
tion under international law is
a war crime,” Mr. Erekat wrote

in a tweet.
Some of Mr. Netanyahu’s
election rivals also criticized
his announcement and called
it an election stunt.
“Netanyahu has had 13
years as prime minister and
no one stopped him from ap-
plying sovereignty to the Jor-
dan Valley,” said Yair Lapid, a
leader of the centrist Blue and
White party that is Mr. Netan-
yahu’s biggest election threat.

The Trump administration
has taken a series of moves
that Palestinians say have al-
tered the status quo, including
recognizing Jerusalem as Is-
rael’s capital and Israeli sover-
eignty over the Golan Heights.
A Trump administration of-
ficial said Tuesday that U.S.
policy hadn’t changed and that
the Trump peace plan would
be delivered after the Israeli
election as planned.
The Jordan Valley, which
stretches from the West Bank’s
northern borders south to the
Dead Sea, has been a conten-
tious negotiation issue between
Israel and the Palestinians. It
includes the Palestinian town
of Jericho and large swaths of
fertile land the Palestinians say
they need to build an economy
in a future state.
Israel says it needs control
there for security. Mr. Netan-
yahu also has argued that Is-
rael has a historical right to
annex West Bank settlements
as the area was the biblical
home of the Jewish people.
Mr. Netanyahu said his plan
wouldn’t force any Palestin-
ians to live in Israeli-con-
trolled land. Using a map, the
prime minister showed the
Palestinian populations, in-
cluding the town of Jericho,
would be non-Israeli enclaves
with separate routes directly
connecting them to other Pal-
estinian-controlled territories.

TEL AVIV—Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
said he would annex a huge
swath of the West Bank along
the border with Jordan if he
stays in power after next
week’s election, in a last-min-
ute push on Tuesday to draw
more conservative votes.
If he forms a government
and holds to his 11th-hour
campaign pledge, Mr. Netan-
yahu would extend Israeli civil
law to Israeli-controlled parts
of the Jordan Valley and
northern Dead Sea, a fertile
strip of land along the West
Bank’s border with Jordan.
Around 10,000 Israelis and
80,000 Palestinians lived there
in 2016, according to the Is-
raeli nongovernmental organi-
zation Peace Now. The plan
would seem to leave any fu-
ture Palestinian state encircled
by Israel rather than sharing a
border with Jordan.
Mr. Netanyahu issued his
promise before the presenta-
tion of a Trump administra-
tion peace plan, which the
White House is expected to


BYDOVLIEBER
ANDFELICIASCHWARTZ


Netanyahu Vows to Annex Contested Land


Prime minister’s plan


would likely leave any


future Palestinian


state encircled by Israel


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu laying out his campaign promise on Tuesday with a map
showing Jordan in yellow, the area he would annex in blue, and some Palestinian enclaves in orange.

MENAHEM KAHANA/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

testing ballistic missiles, the
North Korean foreign ministry
called him a “human defect.”
Some security experts be-
lieve the negotiating hand of
Kim Jong Un’s regime could
have improved because of the
weapons launches and the
continuing squabbling be-
tween the U.S. and its allies.
“Momentum has swung in
North Korea’s favor,” said Lee
Sung-yoon, a Korea expert at
Tufts University’s Fletcher
School. “Now is the time for
North Korea to push the enve-
lope.”
With a resumption of talks,
Washington and Pyongyang
return to the task of bridging
a significant divide: The two
sides have yet to agree on
how, and when, the Kim re-
gime should start relinquish-
ing its nuclear program.
The North covets a process
that unfolds in a gradual, step-
by-step manner, with the U.S.
rolling back some economic
penalties levied against the

isolated regime. Washington
wants a grander bargain where
Pyongyang agrees to specifics
before the sanctions get lifted.
The Hanoi summit broke
down after the U.S. balked at
the North’s offer to close some
parts of the Yongbyon complex,
the Kim regime’s main nuclear
facility that makes plutonium
and highly enriched uranium.
In return, Mr. Kim demanded a
comprehensive rollback of re-
cent sanctions that have
bruised the North’s economy.
Washington wanted a
broader concessions package
that went beyond Yongbyon.
The U.S. has maintained its
stance of wanting a final, fully
verified denuclearization of
the Korean Peninsula. The
main questions for the ex-
pected talks, security experts
say, will be if the U.S. offers
any major concessions—and
whether doing so can net any-
thing from the North in return.

SEOUL—Seven months after
the U.S. and North Korea
walked out of nuclear talks at
a summit in Vietnam, the two
sides appear ready again to
work toward a deal that trades
Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons
for a loosening of U.S.-led eco-
nomic sanctions.
But the chessboard looks
very different now.
North Korea appears to
have shuffled its negotiating
team from the halted meeting
in Hanoi, and American diplo-
mats to some extent will have
to begin the talks anew. South
Korea and Japan, the U.S.’s
two largest allies in the region,
are sparring over trade. Seoul
has seen its mediator role in
nuclear talks diminished by
the North’s dismissal, and it
defied Washington in August
by pulling out of an intelli-
gence-sharing pact with Tokyo.
What is more, North Korea
has launched nearly a dozen
weapons tests since April, in-
cluding one on Tuesday, sig-
naling it doesn’t intend to be a
pushover if and when the talks
with the U.S. formally resume,
security analysts said.
The disputes between Japan
and South Korea and provoca-
tions of North Korea will likely
complicate U.S. efforts to bro-
ker and ultimately enforce a
comprehensive disarmament
deal with North Korea. Pyong-
yang, in a Tuesday state-media
report, said it was willing to
engage in “comprehensive dis-
cussions” with Washington by
month’s end. The two coun-
tries’ leaders at an impromptu
June 30 meeting had agreed to
restart stalled talks.
The North’s state report
didn’t specify exactly when or
where a relaunch of working-
level talks would take place.
President Trump, after learn-
ing of the state report, said
“having meetings is a good
thing, not a bad thing.”
Tuesday’s departure of na-
tional security adviser John
Bolton, a foreign-policy hawk,
adds another layer of com-
plexity to the situation. Mr.
Bolton was wary of North Ko-
rea and clashed with Pyong-
yang. After Mr. Bolton in May
said North Korea had violated
United Nations restrictions by

BYTIMOTHYW.MARTIN

Playing Field Shifts


ForU.S.,NorthKorea


BYCRAIGNELSON


Afghan Leader Inherits Peace Role


OMAR SOBHANI/REUTERS

Some experts
believe Pyongyang
has improved its
negotiating hand.

RAHMAT GUL/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Free download pdf