Karen_A._Mingst,_Ivan_M._Arregu_n-Toft]_Essentia

(Amelia) #1
contiguous principalities increasingly came to be known—to choose their own reli-
gion, but the Treaties also established that states had the right to determine their own
domestic policies, free from external pressure and with full jurisdiction in their own
geographic space. The Treaties thus introduced the princi ple of noninterference in the
affairs of other states.
Second, because the leaders of Eu rope’s most power ful countries had seen the
devastation wrought by mercenaries in war, after the Treaties of Westphalia, these
countries sought to establish their own permanent national militaries. The growth of
such forces led to increasingly centralized control, since the state had to collect taxes
to pay for these militaries and leaders assumed absolute control over the troops. The
state with a national army emerged as a power ful force— its sovereignty acknowl-
edged and its secular base firmly established. And that state’s power increased. Larger
territorial units gained an advantage as armaments became more standardized and
more lethal.

IRELAND

SCOTLAND

ENGLAND
Atlantic
Ocean

FRANCE

PORTUGAL
SP AIN

BALEARICISLANDS
K INGDOM OF
THE TWO
SICILIES

SARDINIA

CORSICA

AVIGNON

STAPAPAL

SWITZ.
SAVOY

WUR

MILAN VENICE

MODENAPARMATUSCANY

Ad HUNGARY
ria
ti c
Se
a

POLAND

NORWAY SWEDEN

Ba

lt
ic

Se

a

DENMARK

North
Sea

Lands administered by
Roman Catholic Church
Spain
Austria
Brandenburg-Prussia
Boundary
of the Holy
Roman Empire

ARAGON

CASTILE

PRUSSIAEAST
BRANDENBURG

MECKLEN-BURG

BAVARIA

HESSE SAXONY
LORRAINE

OVERHAN-

AUSTRIA

PROVINCESUNITED

Med iterra ne an Sea

PIEGENOA

DM

ONT

SPANIH
NETH
.

SPANIH
NETH.

WURTTEM-

STPAAPAL

S

TES

BURG

Eu rope, c. 1648

24 CHAPTER Two ■ Historical context of international relations

ESSIR7_CH02_020_069_11P.indd 24 6/14/16 10:01 AM

Free download pdf