reSeArCH Letter
or plane addition despite rescaling and regenerating their other
tissues (Extended Data Fig. 5f–j). In summary, fission planes are pre-
established in planarians and correlate dynamically with worm size
and form.
Given the role of Wnt and TGFβ signalling in body patterning, we
tested whether genes of these signalling pathways regulate fission
planes. Worms treated with RNAi were mechanically compressed and
the quantity and relative distribution of fission planes was measured
(Fig. 3e–g). Notably, whereas RNAi of actR-1 and smad2/3 moderately
reduced the number of fission planes, RNAi of Wnt signalling com-
ponents had no effect on fission plane number or position (Fig. 3e, g,
Extended Data Fig. 6a). Even knockdown of wnt11-6 by three rounds
of amputation and regeneration did not alter fission-plane patterning
(Fig. 3f, g, Extended Data Fig. 6b). Hypomorphic RNAi knockdown of
β-catenin, actR-1 or smad2/3 revealed little or no effect on the size of
fission fragments (Extended Data Fig. 6c–e), which further supports
the conclusion that neither Wnt nor TGFβ signalling regulate fission
behaviour through the anterior–posterior patterning of fission planes.
We tested whether Wnt and TGFβ signalling instead regulated the
frequency of fission attempts. Using the automated webcam image-
capture system (Fig. 1f), we recorded fission behaviour in RNAi-
treated worms (Fig. 4a). RNAi of β-catenin, actR-1, smad2/3 and
wnt11-6 reduced fission attempts, whereas RNAi of apc increased
fission attempts (Fig. 4b–d, Extended Data Fig. 7a–l, Supplementary
Videos 4–6). RNAi of β-catenin and smad2/3, which resulted in observ-
able morphological abnormalities, also significantly reduced the
fission-success ratio (Figs. 2d, 4e, Extended Data Fig. 7k–n). dsh-B
RNAi reduced the fission success ratio without altering the number
or frequency of fission attempts (Fig. 4d, e, Extended Data Fig. 7k–n).
Finally, apc RNAi reduced the time between fission attempts by approx-
imately 50%, and worms initiated fission attempts independently of
remaining tissue, markedly reducing their success ratio (Fig. 4e,
Feed 2–3× per week
Low ssion activity
Recirculation culture
Starve
High ssion activity
Static culture
abDay 1 c Day 14
4 812
Length parent (mm)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Size rst ssion fragment
PCC = 0.1986
y = 0.03437X + 1.208
R^2 = 0.04
4 8121620
0
5
10
15
Length parent (mm)
Progeny (14 days)
PCC = 0.9187
y = 0.8727X – 4.38
R^2 = 0.84
0102030
Time (s)
Unsuccessful ssion attempt
010203040
Time (s)
Successful ssion attempt
e
h
i
f
g
0510 15
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Length parent (mm)
Success ratio
PCC = –0.5798
y = –0.08225x + 1.377
R^2 = 0.3362
0510 15
0
5
10
15
Length parent (mm)
Total attempts
PCC = 0.827
y = 1.09x – 5.004
R^2 = 0.684
d
02468
Time (days)
Animal length
4 mm
5 mm 6 mm 7 mm 8 mm 9 mm
11 mm
0 min 10 min 20 min 30 min40 min0 min 10 min 20 min 30 min
Fig. 1 | Planarian fission is a size-dependent behaviour. a, Optimized
fission protocol. b, c, Representative images of 5–12-mm worms and
fission fragments less than 24 h (b) and 14 days (c) after the first fission
event (n = 46 worms from 1 experiment). Scale bars, 5 mm.
d, e, Length of the first fission fragments (d) and progeny number (e)
over 2 weeks relative to parent length (n = 46 (d) or 30 (e) worms from
one experiment). f, Webcam live-imaging schematic (left) and example
timeline depicting successful (middle) and unsuccessful (right) fission
attempts. g, Representative fission behaviour timelines from a range of
parent lengths. h, i, Total fission attempts (h) and successful attempts per
total attempts (i) relative to parent length (n = 39 (h) and 21 (i) worms).
Data are from a single experiment. Pearson correlation co-efficient (PCC),
linear regression (red line), and R^2 values are provided.
656 | NAtUre | VOL 572 | 29 AUGUSt 2019