The Guardian - 15.08.2019

(lily) #1

Section:GDN 1J PaGe:6 Edition Date:190815 Edition:01 Zone: Sent at 14/8/2019 16:58 cYanmaGentaYellowbla



  • The Guardian Thursday 15 Aug ust 2019


6 Letters


Your article on Hinkley Point C
outlines the rising costs, long delays
and the mental health crisis among
the employees building this new
nuclear power station ( Report ,
14 August). It suggests the much -
delayed project may be delivered
around 2025-6. But even this
assessment should be treated with
caution. An identical reactor being
built at Flamanville in France, which
was started in 2007, was supposed
to open in 2012. The French nuclear
regulator has now sought more work
on faulty welds across the reactor,
meaning another three -year delay
until 2022. The additional costs will
burden EDF further and inevitably
impact on Hinkley Point C. I agree
with the National Infrastructure
Commission that the costs and
delays to new nuclear are such
that the UK has to refocus on more
deliverable and cheaper renewable
energies. Across the board these are
being delivered now and we simply

Tumbling towards a


no-deal catastrophe


Nuclear energy and alternatives


England is one of the only large
countries that does not wait for
confi rmed results before off ering
places on higher education courses,
and Jo Grady is absolutely right to be
calling for a new system ( Education ,
13 August). The education system
is changing, so we need to make
sure the applications process is still
fi t for purpose. W e’ve seen a rapid
rise in unconditional off ers. These
cannot be justifi ed and are not in the
interests of students. However, they
are largely a response to an increase
in competition between institutions.
We need wide-reaching
change to build a fair and transparent
post-qualifi cations system. It is
too easy to talk up the risks of
changing the system without fully
recognising the benefi ts. It is high
time we approached this in an open-
minded way and use our combined
eff orts to support a planned approach
to transform the process for the

Transforming uni


applications system


Hoppy
days
‘Taken on
Shetland in
March 2019.
There was a
pond full of
frogs. Not seen
so many since I
was a child.’
MARK RAYMENT/
GUARDIAN COMMUNITY
Do you have
a photograph
you’d like to
share with
Guardian
readers? If so,
visit gu.com/
letters-pics to
upload it, and
we’ll print the
best ones on
these pages

be drawn from the past three years is
that the electorate should be invited
to reconsider Brexit on the basis of
full information the truthfulness of
which can be tested.
Bernard Staff ord
Yo rk


  • Gisel a Stuart speaks of a deal not
    being possible but of course it is if
    the government would accept the
    one Theresa May agreed with the
    EU. What may not be possible is for
    them to accept the removal of the
    Irish backstop, but this is something
    only the UK out of 2 8 nations is
    demanding. No club would change
    its rules if only one member was in
    favour and the rest against.
    Dr Richard Turner
    Beverley, East Riding of Yorkshire

  • I voted Brexit in the original
    referendum; mainly because of the
    reported widespread corruption in
    Brussels and because of my personal
    and professional experience of
    prescriptive regulation stifl ing
    innovation and entrepreneurial
    business. However, approaching four
    years on from the dishonest claims
    by politicians and the discussion
    before that referendum, we now
    know so much more. There is a very
    complex, well-developed, integrated
    supply chain between businesses
    and consumers across the EU and
    with international trade. It took 40
    years to develop and will take just as
    long to develop a new one, but we
    start off on the back foot if we leave.
    That is even if we accepted the deal
    negotiated by the last PM’s team.


of the time, and used up a much
higher proportion of its fuel. It could
use spent fuel from conventional
reactors as its fuel, converting the
“waste” into something that only
needed to be stored for a few hundred
years, rather than thousands.
Unfortunately, the project
was cancelled by the Clinton
administration. It is good that the
MSR is again being pursued , but the
IFR also needs to be reconsidered.
Mike Ellwood
Abingdon, Oxfordshire


  • The sudden energy failures ( Report ,
    13 August) are a result of capacity
    problems, namely the phasing out of
    tried and tested coal -fi red stations.
    By all means bring on renewables but
    keep the tried and tested on stream
    to come into their own for the events
    we have just witnessed. Capacity
    problems also infl ate prices. It is
    imperative that proposed closures
    of remaining coal -fi red stations such
    as Fiddlers Ferry in Warrington are
    cancelled or at least suspended.
    John Barstow
    Pulborough, W est Sussex


In an eff ort to promote a no-deal
Brexit, Gisela Stuart asserts “ let’s
be clear about one thing: the voters’
decision to leave the European
Union and how politicians have gone
about implementing the result are
two diff erent issues ... the paralysis
of indecision ... has been corrosive
and damaging” ( Opinion , 12 August).
She goes on to insist on the absolute
imperative of respecting the result
of the 2016 referendum. It would be
hard to come up with a more fl awed
and misleading interpretation of the
past three years than that.
The present Brexit impasse arises
not from poor governance and
irresolute politicians but from a
rational collective judgment – now
that some of the costs of the Brexit
alternatives have become clearer,
there is no majority in parliament
and the country for any means of
achieving the outcome voted for in
the 2016 referendum. The will of
the people as of 2016 is inconsistent
with the somewhat better informed
will of the people now.
The fundamental source of this
diff erence is the lack of democratic
content in the 2016 Brexit vote. A
political vote is only democratic if the
electorate has access to reasonably
comprehensive and honest
assessments of the consequences of
voting one way or the other. In 2016
this information was unavailable
through a combination of the use of
blatant untruths and omissions.
This impasse will not be overcome
by blustering exhortations to deliver
on the result of a seriously fl awed
referendum. The right conclusion to

do not have the time to wait for new
nuclear. Let’s go for an expansive
renewable energy system, backed up
with energy effi ciency and energy
storage. The climate emergency is
too  pressing for us to take our time.
Councillor David Blackburn
Chair of UK & Ireland Nuclear Free
Local Authorities Steering Committee


  • Prof Neil Hyatt ( Letters , 8 August )
    suggests we should be considering
    doing something with our existing
    nuclear waste. There is something
    that could be done to make the
    problem much easier to solve, and
    also provide a way of generating
    power that is free of CO^2 emissions.
    Between 1984 and 1994, Argonne
    National Lab in the US was working
    successfully on a project called the
    integral fast reactor (IFR). Like the
    molten salt reactor (MSR) pioneered
    by Oak Ridge National Lab, it was
    inherently safer than the light-water
    reactors used in most power stations


Philip Hammond is reported
recently as having said that a no-deal
Brexit would result in a lonely “little
England”. He is right. In the event of
Brexit, Scotland’s fi rst minister has
stated clearly that she will push for
a second referendum on Scottish
independence. Labour “will not
get in the way” of that. The EU will
give every possible incentive to
Scotland to leave the UK and join
the EU. The Northern Ir ish border
will be a potentially explosive issue
and many Protestants will go to
Scotland resulting in the reunifi cation
of Ireland. Wales is already very
dependent on the EU and likely to
go the same way as Scotland.
So, yes, Hammond is right : if
Brexit goes through, with or without
a deal, Boris Johnson is very likely to
be the last PM of the United Kingdom.
Common sense says that parliament’s
duty is to act and insist now that there
is another referendum with the option
of wiping the slate clean, revoking
article 50 and staying in the EU.
Bill Butterworth
Devizes, Wiltshire


  • As an Anglo-Welsh European
    I was interested to read John
    Denham’s piece on English
    nationalism ( Opinion , 13 August),
    but disappointed by the familiar
    whiff of sullen resentment towards
    Scottish and Welsh devolution. The
    reason Scotland and Wales now


better. England’s colleges are ready
to help lead the way.
David Hughes
Chief executive at the Association
of Colleges


  • The annual obsession with
    A-level grades refl ects an age when
    few were deemed worthy and
    capable of benefi tting from higher
    education, to an age when it is widely
    recognised that everyone benefi ts
    from continuing education and the
    highly educated society this brings.
    We should look to expand higher
    education to the population, not
    contin ue to obsess over A-levels.
    Roy Boff y
    Formerly senior adviser for further
    education, Dudley LEA

  • If ( only) three out of 10 students
    end up paying off their student
    debts ( Report , 13 August), well that
    leaves 70% in debt for most of their
    li ves ... an horrifi c outcome for little
    public purse return, but great for
    the private debt company.
    Rowan Vuglar
    London


We do not
publish letters
where only an
email address is
supplied; please
include a full
postal address,
a reference to
the article and a
daytime phone
number. We
may edit letters.
Submission and
publication of all
letters is subject
to our terms
and conditions:
see gu.com/
letters-terms

If Brexit goes through,
with or without a deal,
Boris Johnson is very
likely to be the last PM
of the United Kingdom

Bill Butterworth

have limited control over their own
aff airs is because they fought and
campaigned for this kind of civic
nationalism for decades. If English
people really wanted their own
regional parliament, they could have
done likewise, instead of constantly
playing the victim and voting for a
gang of Brexit fanatics to wreck the
country and drag the rest of the UK
down with them. At this late stage,
the best remaining option is to revoke
article 50 so the rest of the UK can
stay in the EU, then let England
secede from two unions it has never
understood and clearly despises.
Chris Webster
Gümligen, Switzerland


  • I have read so much about the
    eff orts being made to prevent Boris
    et al pushing through a no-deal
    Brexit, and their aim to do this
    alongside a strategy for winning
    the election afterwards. But isn’t it
    possible this über-Machiavellian
    power hub could be planning to get
    Brexit through without a deal, call
    an election immediately with all the
    hell and chaos ensuing, and be quite
    happy for Labour to win so they
    would not be able to carry out their
    hugely needed social healing policies
    because they need to cope with the
    fall out of Brexit and a below-the-
    plimsoll-line economy. Then they
    would collapse as a government and
    Boris could win back power and,
    bingo, be there for the long haul.
    Angela Neustatter
    London

  • Before we get too carried away about
    the prospects of increased trade with
    America ( Report , 13 August), it’s worth
    remembering that the carbon cost of
    importing or exporting a given item
    could be roughly 100 times greater
    than to Europe (3,000 miles v 30).
    Mick Crawley
    Ascot, Berkshire


РЕЛИЗ ПОДГОТОВИЛА ГРУППА "What's News" VK.COM/WSNWS

Free download pdf