F1 Racing UK – August 2019

(singke) #1
NotoLondon
Given all the publicity that the
Mayor of London has been
giving to pollution levels, Ifi nd it
extraordinary he wouldprom ote
having a grand prix in the City.
The extra pollution would not
be just from the race itself. The
race teams use upto 300 trucks
as they head from race to race,
and don’t forget all of those
contractors moving into the city
days, if not weeks, before toerect
barriers. Then there are the road
closures and huge inconvenience
to residents and commuters.
Plus, for the average race fan
the cost of attending the event
would be extortionate. The cost of
accommodation in the city would
be prohibitive as most hotels
would see an “opportunity”to

take advantage of fans.
The British GP should always be
held at aproper race circuit.
Derek Neale
By email
F1R:WithSilverstone’snewdeal
confirmed,araceinLondonwould
notbetitledtheBritishGrandPrix

And notoSky
I read with interest theletter in
the July issue ofF1 Racingfrom a
reader who praised the dela yed T V
showing of highlights from races.
Like him, I am alsoa life-long F1
fan andlook forward to each race
with great anticipation. However,
I personally believethat Sky TV’s
restriction of livebroadcasts on
other channels and the relegation
of coverage tohighlights on
Channel 4, hours afterthe race

The resurrection of the idea of leading F1 through the streetsLondon hasn’t gone down well with everyone

is doing irreparable harm.
I fi nd myselfhaving to avoid
all media once the actual race
has begun in order not to learn
the resultbefore the delayed
highlights. In addition, I alsowant
to watchthe whole race, and not
just the fo otage thata T V editor
considers to be the most relevant
or exciting.
Such action undoubtedly
dampens theenthusiasm of fans
unwilling to paySky’s pay-per-
view prices to watch the raceslive.
When coupl ed with the often
restrictive F1 rulesand penalties
that havebegun to strangle the
sport, there’s a real dangerthat
many fanswill turn away from
F1 in fru stration.
Jem Bruce
Suffolk, UK

>You grill Haasteam principal GuentherSteiner
>Now ThatWas a Car: TheFerrari F1-2000
>The long interview:Cyril Abiteboul
>We take a look at drivers and their pre-race routines

ON SALE


AUG


29


★On sale the
same day as
the print edition

Go to http://www.f1racing.co. uk/digital-edition/


THIS


MONTH


F1 RACING AUGUST 2019 103

VETTEL
What nextfor the
four-time champion?

YOUNG GUNS
Who’stop of the
class so far?

ESTEBAN OCON
Mercedes’
real ‘wingman’

GET THEWORLD’S
BESTF1 MAGAZINE
WHEREVERYOU ARE

PICTURES


:ZAK MAUGER


;GLENN DUNBAR


;STEVEN TEE


;DOM


RO


MNEY


.*CO


NTENTS MA


YBE SUBJECT


TO


CHANGE.


NEXT


MONTH*


Disappointed...
I was extremelydisappointed
at the tone and content of
Nigel Roebuck’s article on Didier
Pironi (F1 Racing, July 2019).
I appreciate that he continues to
be Gilles Villeneuve’s cheerleader-
in-chief but this does not excuse
the spiteful and inaccurate nature
of his piece.
Pironi’s actions in the drivers’
strike in South Africa in 1982,
where he acted as one of the lead
negotiators, does not support
Roebuck’s assertion that the
Frenchman was a self-centred
individual.
In addition, Pironi was not
totally eclipsed by Villeneuve
during his stint at Ferrari; indeed
he was regularly outqualifying the
Canadian during the second half
of the 1981 season.
Above all, it is inexcusable to
imply that Pironi was responsible
for Villeneuve’s death. Many
would argue that Villeneuve’s ‘all
or nothing’ approach to racing
would inevitably lead to agrim
end to his career.
Adrian King
By email

★Download and
read it on your
PC, Mac or iPad

★ It’s identical
tothe print
edition

INBOX


@F1Racing_mag

facebook.com/f1racingmag

instagram.com/f1_racing_mag

[email protected]

F1 Racing, 1 EtonStreet,
Richmond,London, TW9 1AG

FINISHING STRAIGHT HAVEYOUR SAY

Free download pdf