The Economist - USA (2020-02-15)

(Antfer) #1

54 Business The EconomistFebruary 15th 2020


2 and its suppliers, which include Raytheon
and Britain’s bae Systems. baesold 72 Ty-
phoon jets to the desert kingdom in 2007 in
a deal said to be worth around $7bn (which
the firm is keen to extend). Saudi Arabia
has procured antimissile systems from
Lockheed Martin and Raytheon.
But there are some things that Ameri-
can firms will not—or cannot—sell. Inter-
national arms treaties to which America is
party bar signatories from exporting ballis-
tic missiles, as well as certain cruise mis-
siles and armed drones. China, which has
stayed away from these compacts, faces no
such constraints. Once limited to supply-
ing communist revolutionary movements
with small arms, it has become one of the
world’s biggest arms exporters.

Dragon flies
Strategic rivals like India (the world’s sec-
ond-biggest arms importer behind Saudi
Arabia), will not touch Chinese wares. But
China’s armsmakers are making forays
into Africa and the Middle East, especially
with armed drones. Although these may
not be as advanced as American ones, they
can be just as effective—in 2018 the uae
used a Chinese drone to kill a Houthi rebel
leader in next-door Yemen, where it is
fighting an insurgency in a Saudi-led co-
alition. And they cost a quarter as much.
Peter Navarro, President Donald
Trump’s trade adviser, has complained that
the Wing Loong II, made by the Chengdu
Aircraft Industry Group, is a “a clear knock-
off” of the Predator drone built by Ameri-
ca’s General Atomics (ga). Rainbow ch-4
drones, developed by the China Aerospace
Science and Technology Corporation, look
an awful lot like ga’s smaller Reaper. Mr
Trump has sought to ease restrictions on
exports of the American models. Neverthe-
less, points out Pieter Wezeman of sipri,
the deals allow the Chinese to build rela-
tionships in the region, paving the way for
future sales of other systems. Qatar already
has Chinese-made ballistic missiles.
Russia, with domestic sales in decline
since 2016, also covets more Middle East-
ern custom. Like Chinese kit, some of its

technology is cut-price and comes with no
strings attached. Though a lot of it is no
match for the best European or American
equipment, “it’s good enough”, sums up
one industry insider.
Russian firms have yet to break into the
Gulf’s lucrative market; in Dubai the affable
Mr Kladov seemed keenest to flaunt non-
military kit, such as a wine-storage system
made of military-grade materials and a
Kalashnikov passenger hydrofoil. But they
have been supplying deadlier products to
Egypt, temporarily denied American arms
after a military coup in 2013, as well as to
Syria and Iraq. Russia’s government says it
is in talks to sell Sukhoi’s su-35 combat jets
to the uae (though Emirati airmen would
prefer, and will probably get, America’s
snazzier f-35s). The Saudis are discussing
acquisition of the s400 anti-aircraft mis-
sile systems made by Russia’s Almaz-
Antey. America would be miffed if the king-
dom turned to Russia. When Turkey (a
nato ally) agreed to buy the s400s, Ameri-
ca reacted by refusing to sell it f-35s.
Chinese and Russian firms also look
poised to benefit from an arms embargo
which some northern European countries
have imposed on Saudi Arabia over its con-
duct of the war in Yemen and the murder of
a dissident journalist. Germany has
banned weapons made or co-developed by
German firms, or containing German com-
ponents, from going to the Saudis. Cana-
da’s government is under pressure at home
to block an $11bn contract to furnish Saudi
Arabia with armoured vehicles made by
General Dynamics. Britain has suspended
new export licences for equipment that
might be used by the Saudi-led coalition in
Yemen. bae’s £5bn ($6.5bn) deal to sell
more Typhoons may be in jeopardy.
The last threat to Western dominance
may come from the importers themselves.
Big defence contracts typically involve
joint ventures with local companies.
These, says Lucie Béraud-Sudreau of the In-
ternational Institute for Strategic Studies,
another think-tank, enable the customers
to develop weapons themselves. Australia,
Pakistan, South Korea and Turkey have all
developed local defence industries from
scratch, notes Strategy&, a consultancy,
partly through offsets but also because of
policies to help domestic suppliers.
At the Dubai show the uae unveiled
Edge, a consortium of 25 defence firms.
Saudi Arabian Military Industries (sami),
another national group, was set up in 2017.
The Saudis want to localise half their
spending on arms by 2030, from 2% in 2017.
They are enlisting foreign executives and
experts. China has built a drone factory
there; sami is run by a German. It will be a
while before local companies rival the
Western giants. But the days when the West
could sell the sheikhs out-of-date muskets
are not coming back. 7

Arabian knights in shining armour

Source:SIPRI

Worldwide arms imports
By region, %

2009-13

2014-18

Asia Pacific 47.0

Middle East 20.0

Europe 14.0 Africa 10.0

Americas 9.0

Asia Pacific 40.0 Middle East 35.0
Europe 11.0
Africa 7.8

Americas 6.2 T


he ownerof Burger King had a less
than royal 2019. After a sizzling start to
the year Restaurant Brands International
(rbi) shed a fifth of its market value be-
tween August and December. Although it
earns 58% of revenues from a capital-light
franchise business, a bigger slice than Mc-
Donald’s, its return on invested capital is
lower, partly owing to a string of pricey ac-
quisitions (see chart). On February 10th in-
vestors once again digested disappointing
quarterly results from Tim Hortons, a Ca-
nadian doughnut chain which accounts for
60% of rbi’s sales. The group’s overall earn-
ings beat forecasts thanks to Popeyes, an-
other of its chains. rbineeds more spinach
to catch up with rivals such as Yum Brands
(owner of kfc, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell) and
Starbucks—let alone McDonald’s, whose
market value and net income are roughly
that of the other three firms combined. 7

Fast food does not always equal
fast growth

Restaurants

Chasing Ronald


Happy-ish meals

Sources:Datastream
fromRefinitiv;Bloomberg

*Financial years
ending September

80
60

40
20

0
191817162015

Return on invested capital, %

Starbucks*
McDonald’s

Yum Brands

RBI

250
200

150
100

50
20191817162015

Share prices, January 1st 2015=100

Starbucks

McDonald’s
Yum Brands
RBI

Revenues,2019,$bn
Company-operated Franchised

Yum Brands

RBI

McDonald’s

Starbucks*

0 10 20 30
Free download pdf