deposition of Lorraine Fuisz, 80–81, 83.Noel had even dropped by: Theranos, Inc. et al. v. Fuisz Pharma LLC et al.,
deposition of John Fuisz taken on May 29, 2013, in Washington, D.C., 38.
Fuisz had rubbed that fact: Email with the subject line “Gen Dis” sent by Richard
Fuisz to [email protected] at 7:29 a.m. PST on November 8, 2010.
On his way to a resounding: David Margolick, “The Man Who Ate Microsoft,”
Vanity Fair, March 1, 2000.
In one case that illustrated: John R. Wilke, “Boies Will Be Boies, as Another Legal
Saga in Florida Shows,” Wall Street Journal, December 6, 2000.
After a judge in Miami: Ibid.
One of them was a declaration: Theranos, Inc. et al. v. Fuisz Pharma LLC et al.,
declaration of Brian B. McCauley executed in Washington, D.C., on January
12, 2012.
But in a response five days later: Letter dated January 17, 2012, sent by David
Boies to Elliot Peters.
He also offered to meet: Letter dated June 7, 2012, sent by Richard Fuisz to Donald
L. Lucas, Channing Robertson, T. Peter Thomas, Robert Shapiro, and George
Shultz.
The only response he got: Letter dated July 5, 2012, sent by David Boies to Jennifer
Ishimoto.
In 1992, when John was fresh: Terex Corporation et al. v. Richard Fuisz et al., No.
1:1992-cv-0941, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, deposition of
John Fuisz taken on February 17, 1993, in Washington, D.C., 118–54.
At the time, Richard Fuisz: “Manufacturer Sues Seymour Hersh over Scud
Launcher Report,” Associated Press, April 17, 1992.
Even though the incident was twenty years old: Terex Corporation et al. v. Richard
Fuisz et al., stipulation filed on December 2, 1996, by Judge Royce C.
Lamberth dismissing case with prejudice.
Boies’s strategy of painting John: Theranos, Inc. et al. v. Fuisz Pharma LLC et al.,
order filed on June 6, 2012, granting defendant John R. Fuisz’s motion to
dismiss and granting in part and denying in part Fuisz Pharma LLC, Richard
C. Fuisz, and Joseph M. Fuisz’s motion to dismiss.
Boies turned around and sued: Theranos, Inc. et al. v. McDermott, Will & Emery
LLP, No. 2012-CA-009617-M, Superior Court of the District of Columbia,
complaint filed on December 29, 2012.
“Simply because attorneys”: Theranos, Inc. et al. v. McDermott, Will & Emery