authoritarianism’
BYSPECIALARRANGEMENTdomtoputabidingconstraintson
capitaldoesnotexistbecausecapit-
alismis a deterministicforce.Or to
putit differently,ina waythatex-
plains whytheyarecalled the“spon-
taneous” tendenciesofcapital:in
capitalism, theonlythingthatpos-
sessesfreedomor spontaneityiscap-ital. Wedon’tpossessthefreedomto
constraincapital(atleastnotper-
manently).It is in thenatureof these
tendencies, and therefore in the
natureof capital, to refuseto tolerate
more than temporary constraints
upon itself. And,if thisis right,I am
sayingthatwhatweareseeingtodayis liberalism’sessentialrolein facilit-
atingthesetendencies.Allthishas
interestingconsequencesforhowto
thinkabout thestandard debates
thatI mentionedearlier.
AnotherwaytoelaboratePat-
naik’spointis in termsof a disjunc-
tion.Ashesays,whatfollowsfrom