Discover – September 2019

(Greg DeLong) #1

20,000


25,000


30,000


35,000


40,000


U.S. Deaths by Firearms, 1968–2017


Ye a r


N


u


m


b


e


r


o


f


f


a


t


a


l


i


t


i


e


s


2


0


1


7


2


0


1


6


2


0


1


5


2


0


1


4


2


0


1


3


2


0


1


2


2


0


1


1


2


0


1


0


2


0


0


9


2


0


0


8


2


0


0


7


2


0


0


6


2


0


0


5


2


0


0


4


2


0


0


3


2


0


0


2


2


0


0


1


2


0


0


0


1


9


9


9


1


9


9


8


1


9


9


7


1


9


9


6


1


9


9


5


1


9


9


4


1


9


9


3


1


9


9


2


1


9


9


1


1


9


9


0


1


9


8


9


1


9


8


8


1


9


8


7


1


9


8


6


1


9


8


5


1


9


8


4


1


9


8


3


1


9


8


2


1


9


8


1


1


9


8


0


1


9


7


9


1


9


7


8


1


9


7


7


1


9


7


6


1


9


7


5


1


9


7


4


1


9


7


3


1


9


7


2


1


9


7


1


1


9


7


0


1


9


6


9


1


9


6


8


32
DISCOVERMAGAZINE.COM


A


L


I


S


O


N


M


A


C


K


E


Y


/


D


I


S


C


O


V


E


R


A growing chorus of researchers wants to study


gun violence in the U.S. as a public health issue,


similar to the way they have tracked automobile or


workplace safety for decades. Though limited by


largely political obstacles around funding, experts


including epidemiologists, social scientists and stat-


isticians say that unbiased, peer-reviewed research is


a missing piece of the gun violence discussion. Given


the magnitude of the problem — not just in lives lost


but in the consequences for survivors, families and


entire communities — a purely scientific approach


may hold the key to making progress toward reducing


injuries and fatalities.


There’s one problem: Where to begin?


“We just don’t know very much,” says Andrew


Morral, a behavioral scientist who leads a RAND


Corporation initiative called Gun Policy in America.


“We haven’t been investing as a country in research


in this area in the same way that we have in motor


vehicle accidents, for instance, where for [more than]


35 years we’ve had an entire agency devoted to that,


collecting fantastic data. The result has been that


motor vehicle accidents are [a] quarter of what they


were at the time the National Highway Traffic Safety


Administration was started.”


A 2017 JAMA study estimates that for every death


due to firearms, the U.S. spends about $63 on research


into the topic. In contrast, research spending on


motor vehicle deaths is about $1,000 per fatality.


That disparity is particularly striking because


the number of lives lost is similar: From 2008 to


2017, there were 342,439 deaths by firearm and


374,340 motor vehicle deaths.


As former congressman Jay Dickey wrote in 2012,


“The United States has spent about $240 million a year


39,773: how many


Americans lost their lives


to firearms in 2017.


1.625 million: the


number of Americans who


have died from gunfire


since 1968 — more than the


accumulated American


deaths from all wars since


the country’s founding


more than 200 years ago.


These are numbers that


everyone agrees on. From


here, nearly everything


else that can be said about


gun violence in the U.S.


elicits a partisan response.


It doesn’t have to be this


way.


A purely


scientific


approach


may hold


the key


to making


progress


toward


reducing


injuries


and


fatalities.


Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics

Free download pdf