The Guardian - 24.07.2019

(Michael S) #1




is mostly not much disturbance,”
says Rock. “It’s 4-6C warmer, which
means gulls are capable of starting
their breeding season earlier than
those who breed on islands. We
provide them with street lighting,
which means they can forage at
night as well as during the day.” He
has seen birds take a “steam bath”
using the emissions from heating
fl ues. “Then, after that, they will
fi nd extractor fans blowing out
warm air, so they’ll get a blow-dry
as well.”
They are clever, resilient birds.
“Many admire them for their
adaptive skills,” says Dee. “Some
people hate them and think they’re
the new urban pigeons.” Are they
a problem? “A lot of people see it
PHOTOGRAPHS: GETTY; PAthat way,” says Rock. “My personal

Cash-strapped


councils spend


thousands on


controlling the


birds – but there


is no evidence


it works


Gizmo, the
unlucky
chihuahua


opinion is I wish people would see
the decline of some species as a
problem.” There is a view that other
bird species are being pushed out by
gulls, but Rock doesn’t believe this is
the case.
Still, cash-strapped councils are
spending hundreds of thousands
of pounds on trying to control the
birds. In her research, Sarah Trotter,
an assistant professor of law at the
London School of Economics, found
Dumfries and Galloway in
Scotland spent £263,000
between 2009 and 2016;
Aberdeen spent £27,000 in
2015-16. The people doing
well out of our growing antagonistic
relationship with gulls, points out
Rock, are the pest control companies


  • who use plastic owls in an attempt
    to scare them away, fl y birds of prey,
    erect netting and swap eggs in nests
    for fake ones – even though he says
    there is no evidence any of it works.
    And, says Whitehead: “If you
    don’t know what the overall
    population is, you don’t know
    at what point controls become
    damaging. You can apply to Natural
    England for a licence to cull gulls,
    but you’ve got to come up with some
    good reasons to do this.” This could
    include gulls nesting at airports,
    for instance. “Nicking a chip is
    not a good reason to kill whole
    populations of animals.”
    A better solution, he says, would
    be to change our own behaviour.
    “You can walk down the seafront
    and you will see people throwing
    the odd chip, or a bit of sandwich,
    for a gull. Gulls are quite long-lived
    birds – up to 30 years – and as soon
    as they associate humans with food,
    they won’t distinguish between food
    that is given and food that is there
    for the taking. They also learn pretty
    quickly that if bin bags are left out or
    aren’t collected, that our streets are
    pretty good sources of food. If there
    is a confl ict, it’s in the way we deal
    with food.”
    Noise and nuisance is one thing,
    but actual, direct aggression is still
    very rare, says Portugal. “If you
    know there’s a gull nest then it’s
    probably good to avoid being around
    it too much to avoid any direct
    confrontation. But I don’t think it’s
    got to The Birds stage, where we
    should all be worried.”


A gull,
undeterred by
a plastic owl

7


РЕЛИЗ ПОДГОТОВИЛА ГРУППА "What's News" VK.COM/WSNWS

Free download pdf