12 ★ FINANCIAL TIMES Friday26 July 2019
COMPANIES
E
lon Muskhas carved out a highly successful
niche as everyone’s favourite techno visionary.
The visions he conjures are always over the
horizon, whether human settlements on Mars
or fleets of fully self-driving cars that operate as
taxis on the side, making their owners a living.
Such promises serve an important purpose, burnishing
his personal brand and bringing a lustre to his companies.
But it is starting to look as though Mr Musk will actually
need to deliver on some of these visions — and sooner
rather than later.
The 14 per cent slice taken out ofTesla’s share price yes-
terday morning is a sign of the disappointment in store if
the stock market decides that the company is just another
carmaker and not the harbinger of a new type of autono-
mous transport-as-a-service company.
After two years of struggles to ramp up the production
and global delivery of its Model 3, Tesla is caught between
two poles: is there enough demand for electric cars to meet
Mr Musk’s high growth targets? And can it make enough
profit both to sustain its heavy investment plans and jus-
tify a stock market valuation that is well ahead of the rest
of its industry? The two are connected. Tesla has been
bringing prices down to generate more demand, but that
has put pressure on profit margins and thrown Mr Musk’s
recent promises of financial sustainability into doubt.
This week’s quarterly earnings report was a demonstra-
tion of how uncomfortable life can be in this squeeze. The
good news is that, even without resorting to advertising,
orders for the Model 3 are still rolling in. But profit margins
aren’t expanding at the rate the optimists had hoped, even
leaving aside one-off factors that made the picture look
particularly bleak this quarter.
For Tesla investors who have suffered the whiplash from
two disappointing quarters, the message from Mr Musk
this week has hardly been reassuring. There is, he said,
more of the same ahead: the next 12 months, like the last,
will see Tesla claw back into profit by the end of the year,
before plunging again into a “tough” first half of 2020.
A clear pattern is establishing itself. Scaling up new pro-
duction lines takes time and strains finances.New model
launches soak up cash. In the
second half of next year, that
will be the Model Y, a small,
crossover sport utility
designed to hit a hot part of
the market.
At least the warnings of
imminent bankruptcy from
the Tesla bears have
receded. Right now, the com-
pany has a record $5bn of cash on hand. But that is partly
because it has trimmed capital spending and R&D. Those
costs will rise again as new models approach, and Mr Musk
conceded that Tesla was likely to slip back into negative
cash flow territory in launch periods.
This is not a formula that will help Tesla break out to
become more than just a low-margin, midsized carmaker
— and one that faces increasing competition as others
flood the electric car market with new vehicles. Hence the
need for robotaxis to ride to the rescue.
Persuading the world that his cars will soon be zipping
around city streets on their own is essential to Mr Musk’s
plans. Tesla buyerspay $7,000 for the company’s self-driv-
ing software, and almost all of that falls straight to the bot-
tom line. According to Mr Musk, if enough people can be
persuaded to payfor the software, Tesla will more than
reach its short-term 25 per cent gross profit margin target.
If customers no longer believe the autonomous future is
imminent, this will be difficult. Mr Musk has promised
Teslas will have full autonomous capabilities by the end of
this year, and that the company will be in a position to
launch a driverless taxi service in the second half of 2020.
His confidence stands in marked contrast to the mood
among others trying to launch driverless cars. General
Motors’ Cruise this week became the latest to pull back
from an overly ambitious timetable, delaying its promised
launch of driverless taxis beyond the end of this year.
It isn’t just that the technology isn’t ready. Amid the
backlash against the tech industry, groups such as Cruise
are laying more emphasis on building broad social support
for their disruptive technologies before unleashing them.
With driverless cars, that will not be quick or easy.
None of this has dented Mr Musk’s confidence, nor the
overriding importance of full self-driving cars to his busi-
ness plans. Earlier this year, he said Tesla would never
make a sustained profit until the era of robotaxis had
arrived. His shareholders can’t say they weren’t warned.
[email protected]
INSIDE BUSINESS
TECHNOLOGY
Richard
Waters
Musk must deliver on
his dreams or risk
missing the robotaxi
Bringing prices
down to generate
more demand
has put pressure
on profit margins
NEIL HUME, ROBERT SMITH
AND ARASH MASSOUDI
Anil Agarwal, the Indian metals
tycoon, is unwinding the complex bet
that made him the biggest shareholder
inAnglo American, ending speculation
that he would launch a bid for one of
the most revered names in mining.
Mr Agarwal is reckoned to have made
about $500m before costs from the
20 per cent stake, people familiar with
the matter said. But those costs are sub-
stantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorgan
and fund the interest payments on the
bonds used to finance the bet.
Those coupon costs alone will have
totalled about $300m since he first put
on the two legs of the trade.
The bonds were issued in March and
September 2017 and gave Volcan, Mr
Agarwal’s family trust, the 20 per cent
stake in Anglo, fuelling speculation that
he was plotting a bid.
The self-made billionaire insisted the
stake was just an investment in a “great
company with excellent assets”. But the
way the deal was structured by bankers
atJPMorgan— it was funded using man-
datory convertible bonds — spoke to a
broader strategic motive.
Often using debt, Mr Agarwal has
amassed a fortune by acquiring
bombed-out mining assets frequently
from the Indian government and trans-
forming their operations.
His dream is to build an Indian ver-
sion ofBHP, the world’s biggest natural
resources group. In 2016, he had tried to
merge his Hindustan Zinc with Anglo,
which was then struggling to service a
large debt load.
Since the first bond was completed,
shares in Anglo have risen more than 80
per cent and the company is now valued
at almost $40bn.
They were due to mature next year
but Mr Agarwal has decided to exercise
a call option and take profits.Because of
the way these embedded derivatives are
structured, the businessman would not
have made any more on the trade even if
Anglo’s share price rose further.
Anglo, which announced a $1bn share
buyback alongside half-year results yes-
terday, declined to comment. Under
Mark Cutifani, chief executive, Anglo
has gone from sector laggard to a com-
pany that can go head-to-head with the
likes of BHP, Glencore and Rio Tinto.
Industrials
Agarwal sells stake in Anglo American
MARK VANDEVELDE— NEW YORK
Tom Barrack, thereal estate investor
and ally of US President Donald
Trump, has struck a deal in which he
will step down as chief executive ofCol-
ony Capital, months after assuming the
roleafter a troubled merger with a rival
fund manager.
Colony will pay $325m to buyDigital
Bridge, which manages a portfolio of
342,000 mobile phone towers and 39
data centres, and which already has a
$4bn joint venture with Mr Barrack’s
company.
Marc Ganzi, who co-founded Digital
Bridge in 2013, will become chief execu-
tive of Colony in 2021, the company
said, taking over a role that Mr Barrack
assumed last year after ousting Richard
Saltzmanfollowing Colony’s merger
with rival fund management group
Northstar. Mr Barrack will return to his
position as executive chairman.
Colony shares have fallen by about
two-thirds since the deal was completed
in early 2017, at a price that analysts say
overvalued Northstar’s real estate port-
folio.Mr Barrack has since had totackle
two campaigns by activist investors.
Under pressure from Senvest Man-
agement, a New York hedge fund, Col-
ony last yearslashedthe management
fees it collects from Northstar Realty
Europe, a publicly traded real estate
investment trust. Then,in February,a
firm named Blackwells Capital prodded
Colony into appointing three new direc-
tors to its board and examining a sale of
non-core assets.
Colony has recently explored a sale of
Colony Industrial, its warehouse portfo-
lio,said people briefed on the talks. It is
unclear whether a deal will materialise,
or when, one of them added.
Colony said the deal announcedyes-
terday would helpit position itself as a
provider of “investment management
products in which the digital and real
estate frontiers intersect”.
One shareholder, speakinganony-
mously, welcomed the move as a sign
that Colony was repositioning itself as
an investment manager that earns fees
for overseeing outside investors’ capital,
rather than a direct owner of specialist
real estate assets, many of which have
underperformed. “One could view this
as a signal that soon the real estate assets
will be sold,” the person added.
Financials
Barrack to bow out as chief of Colony Capital
KANA INAGAKI— TOKYO
CHRIS TIGHE— NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE
Nissanwill axe 12,500 jobs globally and
slim the number of models it produces
by 10 per cent in an expansion of its
restructuring measures after its quar-
terly profit fell 95 per cent.
Thedeeper jobs cuts, which would
represent 10 per cent of its global work-
force, come as Japan’s second-largest
carmaker struggles to stem a deteriora-
tion in profits and the fallout from the
arrest and ousting ofCarlos Ghosn, its
former chairman.
Hiroto Saikawa, chief executive, said
the company had already started cut-
ting output at eight sites, with an initial
6,400 job cuts expected to be completed
by the end of March.
According to a presentation given to
analysts, 2,420 jobs will be cut in the US
and Mexico, 2,540 in India and Indone-
sia, 880 in Japan and 470 in Spain.
As part of the company’s first phase
of headcount reduction, 90 jobs will
also be cut in the UK, where Nissan runs
the country’s largest car plant in
Sunderland.
Fresh questions have emerged about
the plant’s future as Boris Johnson
became theUK prime minister this
week with a declaration to take the
country out of the EU in 99 days.
But Mr Saikawa declined to give any
details on the remaining 6,100 jobs at
six other sites, which will be eliminated
over the next three years.
“It won’t be surprising if additional
jobs are reduced in the UK in the second
phase of the restructuring,” said Koji
Endo, head of equity research at SBI
Securities.
The Unite union said it understood
“there will be no future job losses at the
Sunderland plant as a result of this
announcement”.
Investment in the plant, the UK’s big-
gest single carmaking site,exceeds
£4bn with a further £100m spent to
prepare for the new Juke model.
The plant in north-east England is
already shedding jobs, announcing in
April last year it was seeking volunteers
for redundancy. This was because of the
downturn in demand for diesel vehicles.
The company also announced that
net profit fell 95 per cent to ¥6.4bn
($59m) from ¥115.8bna year earlier in
the April to June quarter. That was well
below analyst expectations of a profit of
¥66.7bn, according to S&P Global Mar-
ket Intelligence. Revenue declined
13 per cent to ¥2.3tn as sales fell in most
of Nissan’s core markets except China,
including a 3.7 per cent drop in the US
and a 16.3 per cent fall in Europe.
As part of plans to slim down its
range of cars, Mr Saikawa said that the
company’s budget Datsun brand for
emerging markets would be placed
under review.
Nissan’s newly formed nomination
committee is expected to accelerate its
search for Mr Saikawa’s successor fol-
lowing the sharp deterioration in finan-
cial conditions.
Mr Saikawa said he would preside
over the initial restructuring phase until
March, but its second phase would
probably be overseen by a new manage-
ment team.
See Lex
Automobiles
Nissan steps up pace of restructuring
Axe to fall on 12,500 jobs
while number of models
produced will drop 10%
Booking.com
considers itself
an intermediary
between
property owners
and guests
Ullstein Bild/Getty
95 %
Fall in quarterly
net profit from
a year earlier
16.3%
Drop in European
sales, against a 3.7%
decline in the US
TOM HANCOCK— SHANGHAI
A privately funded Chinese company
has put satellites into orbit for the first
time, marking a step forward for the
country’s nascent space start-ups.
Beijing-based iSpace’s Hyperbola-
rocket blasted off from a state facility in
northwestern China yesterday, sending
two satellites and payloads into orbit,
the company said.
“The launch mission was a complete
success, achieving a breakthrough for
the Chinese private launch vehicles,”
iSpace said.
Dozens of Chinese satellite companies
have been established since 2014 when
Beijing allowed private investment in
the sector to fuel innovation in space
technology. iSpace was founded in 2016
and has 120 staff.
Cai Jingqi, iSpace’s vice-president,
told state media yesterday that the
launch marked the “official start of
commercial operations”, and showed
the company had mastered the core
technology to build a carrier rocket.
Chinese companies lag behind inter-
national rivals withElon Musk’sSpaceX
becoming the first private company to
launch a liquid-propellant rocket into
orbit in 2008, completing its first com-
mercial satellite delivery six years later.
Analysts said the rockets produced by
many of the Chinese start-ups remained
dependent on technology developed by
state-run companies.
The state-runChina Aerospace Sci-
ence and Technology Corporationisa
major provider of satellite launches for
private and foreign government clients
with 37 successful launches last year.
Attempts to launch payloads into
orbitthis year by two other private Chi-
nese companies,LandSpaceandOne-
Space, ended in failure.
Beijing hopes the development of pri-
vate start-ups will eventually help the
country’s military and state-run compa-
nies to develop more advanced technol-
ogies, a process known as “civil-military
fusion”.
“Private companies have more flexi-
ble and advanced mechanisms and it
will be a win-win situation,” Fu Zhimin,
chief engineer at China Aerospace Sci-
ence and Industry Corp, China’s top
space and defence contractor, told state
mediathis year.
Annual revenues from space-related
business — worth $350bn— could
nearly triple in size by 2040, according
to investment bank Morgan Stanley.
Technology
Chinese group
hails its first
successful
satellite launch
DONATO PAOLO MANCINI AND
MARTIN COULTER— LONDON
Italian authorities are investigating
whetherBooking.comis liable for at
least €150m in unpaid value added tax
on holiday rentals made through its
platforms, say two people familiar with
the matter.
The move underscores growing concern
among governments across the globe as
to how best to adapt to an increasingly
digital hospitality sector.
The investigation concerns VAT on
payments between individuals for
rental properties advertised by the
online travel agent. It does not concern
hotels booked through the website,
which are already registered to pay the
tax.
Booking.com considers itself an inter-
mediary between property owners and
guests, and treats reservations as direct
transactions between the two.
But according to those close to the
investigation, the lack of an automatic
system for VAT payment means the
duty often goes unpaid, resulting in a
significant shortfall over time.
Italian prosecutors are investigating
whether Booking.com should be liable
for paying the VAT owed on payments
made between 2013 and 2018. They
consider the €150m figure a “conserva-
tive estimate”, the people added, based
on an analysis of the company’s reve-
nues in Italy and police interviews with
individuals using its platform.
Last year, Italian authorities con-
tacted their counterparts in the Nether-
lands, where Booking.com is based,
issuing a European investigation order.
An EIO is a legal instrument enabling
officials in one EU member state to
request evidence from another.
The Dutch declined to proceed with
the case, according to one of the people
with direct knowledge of the probe. Ital-
ian authorities now intend to file a
revised EIO to push the case forward.
The Dutch prosecutor’s office declined
to comment, citing confidentiality.
Booking.com said it had not been
“notified of any issue” by Italian author-
ities. It added that the commission it
charges its accommodation partners,
such as those renting out their proper-
ties, is subject to VAT and “it is [their]
responsibility to report this directly to
local government” in the EU.
Lee Horowitz, co-head of internet
equity research at Evercore ISI, said reg-
ulation of the online hospitality indus-
try was fragmented, and tax agencies
were responding to a changing land-
scape. “[The tax issues] are certainly
seen as a headache,” he said, though he
cautioned that investors were probably
more worried about other metrics, such
as revenue and earnings before tax.
“Booking’s got much bigger fish to fry
in terms of other larger headwinds to
the overall travel industry,” he added.
Airbnb, the US company offering a
similar service, operates a system in
which it collects tax on behalf of the Ital-
ian governmentbefore passing the pay-
ments on. Despite this,it has faced pres-
sure from governments to ensure its
users pay the appropriate taxes.
In March, the UK’s HM Revenue &
Customs issued a“call for evidence”in
an attempt to improve VAT compliance
by individuals using ecommerce plat-
forms such as Booking.com, Amazon
and Uber to sell goods, let out spare
rooms or take part in the gig economy.
Technology
Booking.com faces Italian inquiry over unpaid VAT
РЕ
ЛИ
ЗП
Пon the two legs of the trade.on the two legs of the trade.on the two legs of the trade.on the two legs of the trade.ООД
totalled about $300m since he first put
Д
totalled about $300m since he first put
on the two legs of the trade.on the two legs of the trade.Д
totalled about $300m since he first puttotalled about $300m since he first puttotalled about $300m since he first puttotalled about $300m since he first putГООТ
Those coupon costs alone will have
Т
Those coupon costs alone will have
totalled about $300m since he first puttotalled about $300m since he first putТ
Those coupon costs alone will haveThose coupon costs alone will haveThose coupon costs alone will haveThose coupon costs alone will haveООВВ
Those coupon costs alone will haveThose coupon costs alone will haveИИЛ
bonds used to finance the bet.bonds used to finance the bet.bonds used to finance the bet.bonds used to finance the bet.ЛААГ
and fund the interest payments on the
Г
and fund the interest payments on the
bonds used to finance the bet.bonds used to finance the bet.Г
and fund the interest payments on theand fund the interest payments on theand fund the interest payments on theand fund the interest payments on theРРУ
П
stantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorgan
П
stantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorgan
and fund the interest payments on theand fund the interest payments on theП
stantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorganstantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorganstantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorganstantial: he had to pay fees to JPMorganППА
"What's
totalled about $300m since he first put
"What's
totalled about $300m since he first put
on the two legs of the trade.
"What's
on the two legs of the trade.
The bonds were issued in March and"What's The bonds were issued in March and
News"
Those coupon costs alone will have
News"
Those coupon costs alone will have
totalled about $300m since he first puttotalled about $300m since he first putNews"
VK.COM/WSNWS
Those coupon costs alone will have
VK.COM/WSNWS
Those coupon costs alone will have
totalled about $300m since he first put
VK.COM/WSNWS
totalled about $300m since he first put
on the two legs of the trade.
VK.COM/WSNWS
on the two legs of the trade.
The bonds were issued in March and
VK.COM/WSNWS
The bonds were issued in March and