246 CHAPTER 6
theorist Sir Frederic Bartlett (1932) saw the process of memory as more similar to creat-
ing a story than reading one already written. He viewed memory as a problem-solving
activity in which the person tries to retrieve the particulars of some past event (the
problem) by using current knowledge and inferring from evidence to create the mem-
ory (the solution; Kihlstrom, 2002).
Elizabeth Loftus, along with other researchers (Hyman, 1993; Hyman & Loftus,
1998, 2002), has provided ample evidence for the constructive processing view of mem-
ory retrieval. In this view, memories are literally “built,” or reconstructed, from the infor-
mation stored away during encoding. Each time a memory is retrieved, it may be altered
or revised in some way to include new information or to exclude details that may be left
out of the new reconstruction.
An example of how memories are reconstructed occurs when people, upon learn-
ing the details of a particular event, revise their memories to reflect their feeling that they
“knew it all along.” They will discard any incorrect information they actually had and
replace it with more accurate information gained after the fact. This tendency of people
to falsely believe that they would have accurately predicted an outcome without having
been told about it in advance is called hindsight bias (Bahrick et al., 1996; Hoffrage et al.,
2000). People who have ever done some “Monday morning quarterbacking” by saying
that they knew all along who would win the game have fallen victim to hindsight bias.
THINKING CRITICALLY
Think about the last time you argued with a family member about something that happened when you
were younger. How might hindsight bias have played a part in your differing memories of the event?
The response entered here will be saved to your notes and may be
collected by your instructor if he/she requires it.
Submit
MEMORY RETRIEVAL PROBLEMS Some people may say that they have “total recall.” What
they usually mean is that they feel that their memories are more accurate than those of other
people. As should be obvious by now, true total recall is not a very likely ability for anyone
to have. Here are some reasons people have trouble recalling information accurately.
THE MISINFORMATION EFFECT Police investigators sometimes try to keep eyewitnesses
to crimes or accidents from talking with each other. The reason is that if one person tells
the other about something she has seen, the other person may later “remember” that same
detail, even though he did not actually see it at the time. Such false memories are created
by a person being exposed to information after the event. That misleading information can
become part of the actual memory, affecting its accuracy (Loftus et al., 1978). This is called the
misinformation effect. Loftus, in addition to her studies concerning eyewitness testimony,
has also done several similar studies that demonstrate the misinformation effect. In one
study, subjects viewed a slide presentation of a traffic accident. The actual slide presentation
contained a stop sign, but in a written summary of the presentation, the sign was referred
to as a yield sign. Subjects who were given this misleading information after viewing the
slides were far less accurate in their memories for the kind of sign present than were subjects
given no such information. One of the interesting points made by this study is that informa-
tion that comes not only after the original event but also in an entirely different format (i.e.,
written instead of visual) can cause memories of the event to be incorrectly reconstructed.
FALSE MEMORY SYNDROME If memory gets edited and changed when individuals are in
a state of waking consciousness, alert and making an effort to retrieve information, how
much more might memory be changed when individuals are being influenced by others
or in an altered state of consciousness, such as hypnosis? False-memory syndrome refers to
the creation of inaccurate or false memories through the suggestion of others, often while
constructive processing
referring to the retrieval of memories
in which those memories are altered,
revised, or influenced by newer
information.
hindsight bias
the tendency to falsely believe,
through revision of older memories to
include newer information, that one
could have correctly predicted the out-
come of an event.
misinformation effect
the tendency of misleading informa-
tion presented after an event to alter
the memories of the event itself.
These men may engage in “Monday
morning quarterbacking” as they apply
hindsight to their memories of this game.
Their memories of the game may be altered
by information they get afterward from the
television, newspapers, or their friends.