Social Psychology 469Practice Quiz How much do you remember?
Pick the best answer.
- In Asch’s study, conformity decreased when
a. at least four confederates were present.
b. at least one confederate agreed with the participant.
c. the participant was a male.
d. the participant had high self-esteem. - Which of the following would not be effective in minimizing
groupthink?
a. Caroline wants her team to openly vote by a show of hands
either for or against her business plan.
b. Karen openly invites input from all team members and even
those outside her team.
c. Annina reminds her team that everyone will be held responsible
for the ultimate decision of her group.
d. Juanita works hard to remain impartial to all ideas no matter
what they are.
3. One of the keys to deindividuation is
a. group polarization. c. conformity.
b. group protection. d. anonymity.
4. Conner needs just $20 more to go out with his friends. He asks his
mother for $50, but she tells him he can have $30 instead. In the
end, Conner ended up with $10 more than he originally planned.
What technique did Connor use?
a. foot-in-the-door technique
b. door-in-the-face technique
c. lowball technique
d. planned obedience- Follow-up research to Stanley Milgram’s original study has found
that ___ of “teachers” will deliver shocks up to the point
of being lethal.
a. less than 30 percent
b. 40 percent
c. 65 percent
d. 80 percentsocial facilitation = positive influence
social impairment = negative influenceseveral classic studies (i.e., Sherif, Asch) suggest that individuals
will change their behaviors to conform to those of a group
may be influenced by private vs. face-to-face contact, gender, or culturegroupthink: occurs when people within a group feel it is more
important to maintain group cohesiveness rather than critically
evaluate facts when making decisions often with dire consequencessocial loafing occurs when people do not work hard
when others are also working; easy to “hide” in a group
deindividuation group members may feel anonymous
and experience less personal responsibilityfoot-in-the-door technique
door-in-the-face technique
lowball techniqueSocial Influence
(the ways in which a person’s behavior can be affected by other people)a classic study by Milgram
(i.e., teacher/learner electrical
shock study) indicated that
65% of “teachers” went all
the way through shock levels,
despite protest from “learners”conformity
changing one’s own behavior
to more closely match
the actions of otherstask performance
can be affected by
social influencecompliance
persons changing their behavior due to
another person or group asking or directing
them to change, often in the absence of
any real authority or power; susceptibility to
various techniques can vary by cultureobedience
changing one’s behavior at
the direct order of an authority figuregroup behaviorpresence of others
increases arousalgroup polarization
risky shift phenomenonpresence of others
increases extreme
positionsConcept Map L.O. 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4
InteractiveReset