174 Notes
- Eric J. Labs, “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of
War Aims,” Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 1997), pp. 1–49; Randall L.
Schweller, “Neorealism’s Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?” Security
Studies, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Spring 1996), pp. 90–121; Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, “Security Seek-
ing under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited,” International Security, Vol. 25,
No. 3 (Winter 2000/01), pp. 128–161. - Jack L. Snyder, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition
(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), pp. 11–12; Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory
of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979); Stephen M. Walt, The
Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987); Stephen Van Evera,
“Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War,” International Security, Vol. 22, No. 4
(Spring 1998), pp. 5–43; Benjamin Miller, When Opponents Cooperate: Great Power
Conflict and Collaboration in World Politics (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan
Press, 2002); John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After
the Cold War,” International Security, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Summer 1990), pp. 5–56; John
J. Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International
Security, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Winter 1994/95), pp. 5–49; John J. Mearsheimer, The Trag-
edy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001); Randall
L. Schweller, “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,”
International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Summer 1994), pp. 72–107; Labs, “Beyond Vic-
tory”; Fareed Zakaria, From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World
Role (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998). - Gideon Rose, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World
Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1 (October 1998), pp. 144–172, at p. 144; Colin Elman, “Horses
for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?” Security Studies, Vol.
6, No. 1 (Autumn 1996), pp. 7–53, at p. 12; Colin Elman, “Cause, Effect, and Con-
sistency: A Response to Kenneth Waltz,” Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Autumn
1996), pp. 58–61; Kenneth N. Waltz, “International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy,”
Security Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Autumn 1996), pp. 54–57; Labs, “Beyond Victory,”
p. 5; Rose, “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”; Taliaferro,
“Security Seeking under Anarchy,” p. 35. - Morton A. Kaplan, “Some Problems of International Systems Research,” in
International Political Communities: An Anthology (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and
Company, 1966), pp. 469–501; Waltz, Theory of International Politics; Waltz, “Eval-
uating Theories,” pp. 915–916; Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics,
p. 270; William C. Wohlforth, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International
Security, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Summer 1999), pp. 5–41, at pp. 9–22. - Quincy Wright, A Study of War (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,
1942), Appendix 20, Table 43; Krauthammer, “The Unipolar Moment”; Layne,
“The Unipolar Illusion”; Manstanduno, “Preserving the Unipolar Moment”; Sny-
der, Alliance Politics; Kupchan, “After Pax Americana”; Waltz, “Evaluating Theor-
ies”; Wohlforth, “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” p. 8 fn. 11, and pp. 28–37. - Waltz, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”; Waltz, Theory of
International Politics; Waltz, “Evaluating Theories”; Wohlforth, “The Stability of a
Unipolar World.” - Kaplan, “Some Problems of International Systems Research”; Waltz, Theory
of International Politics.