A Grammar of Tamashek (Tuareg of Mali)

(Jeff_L) #1
3.1 Segments 39

(29) Stem-Final i/A-Deletion (Verbs)

Stem-final underspecified vowels III (high) and /A/ (low) are

deleted when not followed by a nonzero subject suffix

The nonzero suffixes expressing imperative subject (MaPl -aet, FePl -maet)

do not count as "subject suffixes" for this purpose and do not block the

deletion (§7.2.3.2).

When deletion of hi produces a word-final CC cluster, depending on

which C's are involved it may be necessary to resyllabify by inserting a schwa

between the two. In T-ka this also entails an accent shift onto the schwa. See

§3.2.4 and §3.3.2 for details.

3.1.2.5 Phonological status of final [u] and [i]

Because word-final (or preconsonantal) u and aw (phonetic [u]) are

indistinguishable, as are i and ay (phonetic [i]), clues from suffixation and

ablaut may be relevant to determining the correct phonological representation.

For nouns, a true final u or i will become α in a nonsuffixal ablaut plural,

since PI ablaut replaces the last V of the stem by a. By the same token, a stem-

final aw will become aw in an ablauted PI, and ay will become ay.

We observe u to a in ee-karfu 'rope' (<Songhay), PI l-kurfa, and

t-a-damu-t-t 'millet beverage', PI t-"i-dama. I know of no example where Sg

stem-final u corresponds to PI aw, though the irregular compound initial massi

'owner of, PI maessaw- 'owners of (§4.1.2.26), is suggestive. Examples

where final HI is replaced by PI α include: t-a-tbaqqi-t-t 'dot', PI t-l-tbaqqa,

and t-a-Yimi-t-t 'sitting' (VblN, Vrym), PI t-Wima (A-grm). Examples where

the PI has ay include t-a-s-ass-awi-t-t 'package' (A-grm), PI t-i-s-ass-iway,

and t-a-s-anji-t-t 'channel', PI t-i-s-anjay. These PI forms justify e.g.

/-tbaqqi-/ for 'dot' with final i, and /-s-ass-away-/ for 'package' with final ay,

as the representations to which PI ablaut applies. Further examples of ablaut

plurals can be gleaned from the lists in the sections beginning §4.1.2.15. Many

of the relevant nouns are derivatives of verbs, where the difference between

final diphthong (vy or vw) and final vowel (υ) is clearly expressed in verbal

inflection. Thus t-a-s-ass-awi-t-t 'package' is a derivative of the Causative of

-uwvy- 'bring' (PerfP -sewwaey-).

While the plural-ablaut test suggests singular representations for 'package'

and 'channel' (preceding paragraph) ending in /...ay-/, the Sg forms end in -t-t,

including inner Fe suffix -t-. This suffixal pattern is otherwise confined to

V-final stems, so the different pieces of evidence conflict. One might conclude

from this that ablaut applies at an early (lexical) stage, while FeSg suffixation

applies to later (post-lexical) representations.

Suffixal plurals (without ablaut) also provide evidence for the status of

final [u] and [i] in singular noun stems. If the noun ends in a true V, we
Free download pdf