107
A large crowd gathers outside
Charles Ponzi’s Boston office in July
1920 after The Boston Post published
a number of articles questioning his
business practices.
WHITE COLLAR CRIMES
By 9 August, his main bank
account was overdrawn and the
district attorney froze it. Knowing
his arrest was imminent, Ponzi
surrendered to federal authorities
on 12 August 1920. He was charged
with 86 counts of mail fraud.
Final years
Ponzi had lost around $20 million
(£150 million) of investors’ money.
While some were paid, Ponzi was
short by $7 million (£53 million). His
arrest brought down six large state
banks, including the Hanover Trust.
Many investors were financially
crippled, receiving under 30 cents
for each dollar they were owed.
The impulsive Ponzi used his
bail release to flee to Florida, where
he launched the “Charpon Land
Syndicate,” another Ponzi scheme
selling swampland to investors
with the promise of substantial
returns on their money. Ponzi was
arrested for fraud and sentenced
to one year in prison, but he was
freed on appeal.
In New Orleans, he was caught
trying to flee to Italy by boat –
despite shaving his head and
growing a moustache to disguise
himself – and was sent back to
finish his original jail sentence in
Boston. Deported to Italy in 1934,
he tried a few more unsuccessful
schemes in Italy before moving to
Brazil, where he died, in 1948. ■
How Ponzi schemes
impact the economy
Ponzi schemes inflict severe
financial damage on investors
and the economy by diverting
money away from productive
and legitimate investments.
The bigger the scam, the more
damage it causes, particularly
once large banks become
involved. When the scheme
is revealed, investors can
lose confidence in those
institutions and are reluctant
to invest in them again.
Discovering and closing
down Ponzi schemes can be
difficult. Often, neither the
perpetrators nor the schemes
themselves are regulated. And
even in regulated institutions,
Ponzi schemes may use
technical language to hide
their true nature.
Ponzi schemes that violate
a number of financial laws
may be investigated
separately by more than one
regulator, which makes it hard
for the bigger picture to
emerge. The financial
significance of the institutions
that have invested in the
scheme can also make
regulators reluctant to
investigate, believing that the
institutions are too big to fail.
102-107_Charles_Ponzi.indd 107 13/01/2017 15:10