150
IT IS THE CONSTANCY
OF NUMBERS
THAT MATTERS
ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE
T
he capacity for ecosystems
to recover following a
disturbance—such as a
large fire, flood, hurricane, severe
pollution, deforestation, or the
introduction of an “exotic” new
species—is known as ecological
resilience. Any of these impacts
can upset food webs, often
dramatically, and human activity
is responsible for an increasing
number of them.
Staying resilient
Canadian ecologist Crawford
Stanley Holling first proposed the
idea of ecological resilience to
describe the persistence of natural
systems in the face of disruptive
changes. Holling argued that
natural systems require stability
and resilience, but—contrary
to what previous ecologists had
assumed—these are not always
the same qualities.
A stable system resists change
in order to maintain the status quo,
but resilience involves innovation
and adaptation. Holling wrote
that natural, undisturbed systems
are likely to be continually in a
transient state, with populations
of some species increasing and
others decreasing. However, these
population changes are not as
important as whether the whole
system is being fundamentally
altered. The resilience of a system
can be described either by the time
it takes to return to equilibrium
after a big shock or by its capacity
to absorb disturbance.
One example that Holling studied
was the fisheries of the Great Lakes
in North America. A large tonnage
of sturgeon, herring, and other fish
was harvested in the early decades
of the 20th century, but overfishing
dramatically reduced the catches.
Despite subsequent controls on
fishing, populations in the Great
Lakes did not recover. Holling
IN CONTEXT
KEY FIGURE
Crawford Stanley
Holling (1930 –)
BEFORE
1859 Charles Darwin
describes the interdependence
between species as an
“entangled bank.”
1955 In the US, Robert
MacArthur proposes
a measure of ecosystem
stability that increases as
the number of interactions
between species multiplies.
1972 In contrast with
MacArthur, Australian
ecologist Robert May
argues that more diverse
communities with more
complex relationships may be
less able to maintain a stable
balance between species.
AFTER
2003 Australian ecologist
Brian Walker works with
Crawford Holling to refine
the definition of resilience.
Ecosystems are dynamic—
constantly changing and
inherently uncertain, with
potential multiple futures ...
Crawford Stanley Holling
US_150-151_Ecological_resilience.indd 150 12/11/18 6:25 PM