The Sociology Book

(Romina) #1

315


Women’s exploitation in the home
is, says Delphy, a consequence of the
combined effects of patriarchy and
capitalism, both of which function to
perpetuate male dominion and control.

The narrative of films such as
Pride and Prejudice, adapted from the
novel by Jane Austen, reinforce the idea
that what every woman wants is to find
the “perfect” man and marry him.


potentially limitless work. This role,
she says, has no job description,
no agreed wage, and no limit in
terms of the hours. In any other
working position, such conditions
would be viewed as exploitative.
And in marriages where a woman
is engaged in paid employment
outside the home, she is also—
in most cases—expected to be
responsible for household and
childcare duties. According
to Delphy, when the domestic
situation is viewed in these
materialist terms, it becomes
obvious that married women
are working for nothing.
Delphy points out that for
Marxists, classes only exist in
relation to one another: there can
be no bourgeoisie (owners of the
means of production) without the
proletariat (the workers). Friedrich
Engels wrote extensively on how


the development of a class society
is the basis for women’s oppression.
He said that with the rise in private
property during the 19th century,
there was a corresponding rise
in inequality because men
increasingly controlled the public
sphere of production, and so
became increasingly wealthy and
powerful. In addition, men wanted
to ensure that their property would
be inherited by their legitimate
male heirs, and the most effective
way of doing this was through the
institution of the monogamous
patriarchal family. In this way,
marriage became a relationship
of property.

Unpaid assistants
Demand for labor increased during
and following the Industrial
Revolution. Women were required
to produce more children to supply
that demand. But the more children
a woman had, the more tightly she
was tied to the household and
unable to work elsewhere. Delphy
also suggests that unmarried
women become “wives” too, in

the sense that their labor was often
appropriated by brothers, fathers, or
employers. This view was partly
influenced by the book
Married to the Job, by British
sociologist Janet Finch. This work
documents how women are
co-opted by employers into a male
relative’s job, but without pay.
This might be through indirect
help, such as entertaining (for
businessmen or politicians); direct
involvement, such as acting as
an assistant (for tradesmen or
academics); or providing welfare,
for example cooking and cleaning
(for members of the clergy).

Materialist feminism
Delphy sees capitalism and
patriarchy as two distinct social
systems, both of which share the
appropriation of labor, and which
influence and shape each other.
Her materialist feminist approach
to the family marks a departure
from earlier forms of feminist
analysis, which did not consider
the role of capitalism. Delphy
pointed out, however, that a ❯❯

See also: Judith Butler 56–61 ■ Friedrich Engels 66–67 ■ Sylvia Walby 96–99 ■ Arlie Russell Hochschild 236–43 ■
Teri Lynn Caraway 248–49 ■ Adrienne Rich 304–09 ■ Ann Oakley 318–19 ■ Steven Seidman 326–31


FAMILIES AND INTIMACIES

Free download pdf