Interpretation
Thiswasindeedthe
beginning
oftheend.Waterloo
wasstillsix
years
ahead,
but
Napoleon
wasonaslowdescentto
defeat,
ciystallizing
in 1812
withhisdisastrousinvasionofRussia.
Talleyrand
wasthefirsttoseethe
signs
ofhis
decline,
especially
intheirrationalwarwith
Spain.
Sometimein
1808,
theminister
decidedthatfor
thefuture
peace
of
Europe,Napoleon
hadto
go.
Andsohe
conspired
withFouché.
Itis
possible
thatthe
conspiracy
wasnever
anything
morethana
ploy~—a
deviceto
push
Napoleon
overthe
edge.
Foritishardtobelieve
thattwoofthemost
practical
menin
history
would
onlygohalfway
intheir
plotting.They may
havebeen
only stirring
the
waters,
trying
to
goad
Napoleon
intoa
misstep.
And
indeed,
what
theygot
wasthetarrtmrnthat
laidouthislossofcontrolforalltosee.In
fact,
Napoleorfs
soon—famous
blowup
thatafternoonhad a
profoundly negative
effecton his
public
image.
This
is
the
problem
with
the
angryresponse.
Atfirstit
may
strikefear
and
terror,
but
only
in
some,
andasthe
days
pass
andthestorm
clears,
other
responses erne:ge—embar1:assment
and uneasiness about the
shouter’s
capacity
for
going
outof
control,
andresentmentofwhathas
beensaid.
Losing
yourtemper,youalways
makeunfairand
exaggerated
accusations.
Afewsuchtiradesand
people
are
counting
the
days
until
you
are
gone.
Inthefaceofa
conspiracyagainst
him,
a
conspiracy
betweenhistwo
most
important
ministers,
Napoleoncertainly
hada
right
tofeel
angry
and
anxious.
But
byresponding
so
angrily,
and
so
publicly,
he
only
demon-
strated
his
frustration.
Toshow
your
frustration
istoshowthat
you
have
lost
yourpower
to
shape
events;
itisthe
helpless
action
of
thechildwhore-
sortstoa
hysterical
fitto
get
his
way.
The
powerful
neverrevealthiskindof
weakness.
Therewerea
numberof
thingsNapoleon
could
havedonein
thissitu~
alien.Hecouldhave
thought
aboutthefactthattwo
eminently
sensible
menhadhadreasontoturn
against
him,
andcouldhavelistenedand
learnedfromthem.Hecouldhavetriedtowinthembacktohim.Hecould
evenhave
gotten
ridof
them,
making
their
imprisonment
ordead;anomi-
nous
display
of
his
power.
No
tirades,
nochildish
fits,
no
embarrassing
afler-elfects—just
a
quiet
anddefinitive
severing
ofties.
Remember: Tantrums
neither
intimidate nor
inspireloyalty. They
only
createdoubtsanduneasinessabout
your
power.Exposing
your
weak’
ness,
these
stormyeruptions
oftenheralda.fall.
OBSERVANCEOFTHELAW
By
thelate
1920s,
HaileSelassiehad
nearly
achievedhis
goal
of
assuming
totalcontrolover
Ethiopia,
a
country
hefeltneeded
strong
andunified
leadership.
As
regent
tothe
empress
Zauditu
(stepdaughter
ofthelate
queen)
and
heirtothe
throne,
Selassiehad
spent
several
yearsweakening
the
power
of
Ethiopia’s
variouswarlords.Now
only
onerealobstaclestood
easily
seewhetherIris
t‘()I1l}lU.$'I1f(’
was
ruffled
ornot
bylooking
axthe
tea.
wizichwouldnot
fallevenlyground
to
the
propercarlsislency
iflrcgo!
excited.
And
so
/‘usllm
was(lone
impartially
and
ptmplfl
wml
away
from
his
court
.raIi.sfz‘ed.
CHA-N0-YU:
wew-Auwsr»."rm
L'l§RlZM()NY
A.L.SADLER.
l962
1}’/m.s'.\‘lblv,
noanimat-
l‘tyslmu1rt
he
feltfor
rznymw.
.,
.To
speak
angrily
toll
person,
to
show
your
hatred
by
what
youmy
or
by
the
wayyou
look,
Lr
an
!lIlIlL‘C(‘S.i‘aIyproceed-
i):g-dangerorrs.fool»
£312,rtrlicrllous,and
vulgar.
A
rrger
orhatredxhoul'rr'
Izeverbeshow;
other»
wisethaninwhat
you
do;
and
feelings
willbe
allthemore
effective
in
action,
inso
far
as
you
avoidtheexhibition
of
themin
any
other
way.
It
is
only
thecold-
blvorlellarlinmlx
whose
bileis
pui.s'mIr)u.r.
Am‘n1;n
S\“Ilf)l’F,NliAlJFR,
1
78244860
LAW 39 327