’l'llK
‘5r'§H§K\Ul’AMKSIS\-‘Vhrn
Aprzerhadbeendcpmred
inthe
way
Ihave
described,
/inmrm
minetothethrone.HeLrelorxgerl
tothedi.xrm:tof
Sui:andwas 41nativr
ofthetowncalled
SiuphAt
firstthe
lfgypziansweminclinedtobe
contemp-
tuour,
anddidnotthinkmuch
ofhimhccuuse
ofhishumbleand
lmdirtinguislzedorigin,‘butlateronhecleverlybrought
themtoheel.wizhout
havingI'(’(:t)urSc‘soharshrrzeaxures.Amongsthisz'zmrmwr-able
treamrer.
hehm!1!goldfoothath,
Whi(‘hhe
andhis
guests
usedonm,-:,'a.s‘i()rztowmhtheir
feet
tn.Thishr’brokeup,
andwiththemate-rialhad
astatus‘nuzrlzetoone
ofthe
gods.\v}z1chhethenre:
upinwhathe
thoughtthemostsuimble
spotinthe
cil‘_v.The
Egywiarzr('uIz.9‘lantl}?cmnmg
uponthe
statue.
Irzatm’itwith
profototdrever-Price,
andassoonasAmu.s‘t'.s‘heard
offheeffect
(I
had
upon
them,heCaller!at
meeting
and
rcvealmlthe
fun
thatthe
deeplyrwetrcul.rmtu,ewas07:01’a
fool-bulh.which
zlwywasher!their
fewandpixxezl
andvamitcdin.Hewmronto
saythat/itsowncarewas
muchthe
sami’,
inthatoncehehadbeen
only
annnlinuryperson
andwasnowtheir
l<:'ng;.votlml
jets!
as
IheyIzodcometorevereHmIftlI1.S'f:)rmZ£§f0€)!b£l(l1,
so
{hay
hmiboiler
pay72 LAW 9InterpretationMichelangelo
knewthatbychanging
theshape
ofthenosehemight
ruintheentiresculpture.
YetSoderiniwasa
patronwhoprided
himselfonhisaestheticjudgment.
Tooffendsuchamanbyarguing
wouldnotonlygain
Michelangelo nothing,
it would
putfuture
commissions injeopardy.
Michelangelo
was
too clever
to
argue.His solution
was tochange
Soden‘m"sperspective(literallybringing
himclosertothenose)
withoutmaking
himrealizethatthiswasthecauseofhismisperception.
Fortunately
forposterity,Michelangelo
found
a
waytokeep
the
perfaction
ofthestatue
intactwhileatthesame
timemaking
Soderinibelievehehadimproved
it.Suchisthedouble
powerofwinningthrough
actionsrather
than
argument:Nooneis
offended,
and
yourpointis
proven.KEYST0POWERIntherealmof
poweryoumustlearn
tojudgeyour
movesby
theirlong»
term
effectsonotherpeople.
Theproblem
in
tryingto
provea
pointorgain
a.victorythroughargument
isthatintheend
youcanneverbecertainhowitaffectsthepeopleyou’rearguing
with:Theymayappear
to
agreewithyoupolitely,
butinsidetheymay
resent
you.Orperhapssomething
yousaidinadvertently
evenoffendedthern—-wordshavethatinsidiousabilitytobeinterpretedaccording
totheotherperson’s
moodandinsecuri-ties.Eventhebest
argumenthasnosolid
foundation,forwehaveallcometodistrusttheslippery
natureofwords.Anddays
afteragreeing
withsomeone,weofienreverttoourold
opinionoutofsheerhabit.Understandthis:Wordsare
a
dime
a
dozen.Everyone
knows
thatintheheatofan
argument,wewillall
sayanything
to
supportourcause.Wewill
quotethe
Bible,refertounverifiablestatistics.Whocanbepersuaded
bybags
ofairlikethat?Actionanddemonstrationaremuchmore
power-fulandmeaningful.They
are
there,
beforeour
eyes,forusto
see-——“Yes,nowthe
statue’snosedoeslook
justright.”Therearenooffensive
words,nopossibility
of
misinterpretation.Noonecan
arguewithademonstratedproof.
AsBaltasarGraciim
remarks,“Themidiisgenerally
seen,rarely
heard.”SirChristopher
WrenwasEngland’s
versionoftheRenaissanceman.He
hadmasteredthesciencesof
mathematics,astronomy,physics,
andphysiology.
Yetduring
hisextremelylong
careerasEngland’s
mostCele‘bratedarchitecthewas oftentold
byhis
patronstomakeimpractical
changes
inhisdesigns.
Neveroncedidhe
argueor
offend.Hehadotherwaysof
provinghis
point.In 1688 Wrendesigned
amagnificent
townhallforthe
cityofWest-minster.The
mayor,
however.
wasnot
satisfied;
infacthewasnervous.HetoldWrenhewasafraidthesecond{floorwasnot
secure,
andthatitcouldall
comecrashing
downonhisofficeonthefirst
floor.HedemandedthatWrenaddtwostonecolumnsforextra
support.
Wren,
theconsummateen-gineer,knewthatthesecolumnswouldserveno
purpose,and thatthe