9: Capital Budgeting Process and Decision CriteriaexampleWhat are the NPVs of each of the investment opportunities now facing Global Untethered? Time lines
depicting the NPV calculations for Global Untethered’s projects appear in Figure 9.3. Discounting each
project’s cash flows at 18% yields the following results:NPV $250
$35
1.18
$80
1.18
$130
1.18
$160
1.18
$175
1.18
WesternEurope 12345 $75.^3
( ) ((()))( )=− + ++++=
NPV $50
$18
1.18
$22
1.18
$25
1.18
$30
1.18
$32
1.18
South-esternAustralia 12345 $25.^7
( ) ((()))( )=− + ++++=
Both projects increase shareholder wealth, so both are worth undertaking. One could say that both
projects outperform the company’s 18% required return, and are therefore acceptable. However, if the
company can make only one investment, it should choose to expand its presence in Western Europe. That
investment increases shareholder wealth by $75.3 million, whereas the South-eastern Australian investment
increases wealth by only about one-third as much. If Global Untethered has 100 million ordinary shares
outstanding, then accepting the Western Europe project should increase the share price by about $0.75 ($75.3
million ÷ 100 million shares). Accepting the South-eastern Australian investment would increase the share price
by almost $0.26 ($25.7 million ÷ 100 million shares).FIGURE 9.3A NPV OF GLOBAL UNTETHERED’S PROJECTS AT 18% ($ MILLIONS): WESTERN EUROPE PROJECT
The net present value (NPV) of Global Untethered’s Western Europe project is $75.3 million, which means that it is
acceptable (NPV > $0) and therefore creates wealth for shareholders.0 1 2 3 4 5End of yearNPV = $75.3–$250 $35 $80 $130 $160 $17529.757.579.182.576.5Formula B8:
–250 + NPV(B7,B2,B3,B4,B5,B6)Net present value $75.3Cash flow 218%–250
35
80Cash flow 1Cash flow 0RowColumnSpreadsheet1
2
3(^4) Cash flow 3 130
(^5) Cash flow 4 160
(^6) Cash flow 5 175
7 Interest
8
9
A B