Introduction to Corporate Finance

(Tina Meador) #1
what companies do

Bring your learning to life with interactive learning, study, and exam preparation tools that support the printed
textbook. CourseMate includes an integrated eBook, videos and quizzes, flashcards and more.

Express

MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND


CORPORATE CONTROL


21-1 Merger waves and international acquisition activity


21-2 Why do companies make acquisitions?


21-3 Do mergers create value?


21-4 Merger and acquisition transaction details


21-5 Accounting treatment of mergers and acquisitions


21-6 Regulation of mergers and acquisitions


21-7 Corporate governance


THE DEAL THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN – BHP BILLITON’S BID FOR RIO TINTO


COLLAPSES


Had the deal been successfully completed,
Australia’s BHP Billiton Ltd’s $140-billion hostile
takeover bid for fellow mining company, Britain’s
Rio Tinto, launched in November 2007, would have
been the third-largest takeover in history. Instead,
the bid’s failure and withdrawal at the end of 2008
resulted in the largest failed takeover attempt
ever, and left the shareholders of both companies
feeling bruised. The merger seemed to make sense
when launched at the peak of the mining industry’s
global business cycle. But by 2008 it had fallen
victim to plunging share and commodity prices,
worldwide economic contraction, opposition from
powerful national and business interests intent on
scuttling a merger between the world’s first- and
third-largest mining companies, and the desire of
Rio Tinto’s board and management team to remain
independent.

When BHP Billiton approached Rio Tinto’s board
of directors on 7 November 2007 with an offer to
exchange three BHP shares for each Rio Tinto share,
this represented a 14% premium over Rio Tinto’s
share price the day before. Rio’s board immediately
rejected the offer as inadequate. Undeterred, BHP
followed up with an identical tender offer targeted
directly at Rio Tinto’s shareholders. It announced that
it had lined up a high-powered set of investment
and commercial banks to advise BHP on its takeover
strategy and to provide financing for a proposed
$30-billion buyback of shares in the combined
company, to be executed if and when the merger
was completed. BHP also described how it would
integrate the two companies, and predicted that it
would be able to generate synergies – cost savings,
increased sales and more productive investment
spending – of $3.7 billion per year.
> >
Free download pdf