The Spartan Regime_ Its Character, Origins, and Grand Strategy - Paul Anthony Rahe

(Dana P.) #1

130 Appendix 1


(Hdt. 7.202, 205.2, 223.2–225.3, 229–33, 9.71.2–4), Lacedaemon was able to


send an army outside the Peloponnesus to Plataea made up of two-thirds of


the surviving adult male Spartiates, in which there were five thousand Spar-


tans (9.10). Sixty-one years later, in 418, at a time of desperation, the Spartans


dispatched an even greater proportion of their available manpower—five-


sixths this time, rather than two-thirds—to fight nearer home at Mantineia


(Thuc. 5.64.2–3). If Thucydides’ figures for the size of the Lacedaemonian


army at Mantineia (5.68) are to be believed and if, as we have reason to expect,


Spartans made up roughly the same proportion (ca. 41 percent) in the lóchoı


deployed as they apparently had in the force chosen a few years earlier by lot


from those units to occupy Sphacteria (4.8.9, 38.5),^19 the city was, six decades


after Plataea, able to field fewer than fifteen hundred full citizens in the lóchoı


and another three hundred hıppeîs as the king’s bodyguard and had an adult


male citizen body of no more than twenty-one hundred.


It is, of course, possible that Thucydides is in error, and many scholars


have argued that the number of lóchoı present and, therefore, the number of


men in the army proper should be doubled.^20 Their incredulity is understand-


able, but, given the evident pride animating Thucydides’ claim to have pene-


trated the veil of secrecy concealing such matters at Lacedaemon and to have


achieved precision concerning this matter, the argument they advance is hard


to swallow. Realizing this, another scholar has suggested that the Spartiates


and the períoıkoı were brigaded separately at Mantineia, as they had been at


Plataea, and that Thucydides erred only in failing to report the presence of the


latter.^21 This, too, seems a stretch. It is contrary to what seems to have been the


case at Sphacteria, and it requires that we suppose Thucydides careless in his


description of the Lacedaemonian force as a whole. On either hypothesis,


however, the number of Spartans in the army at Mantineia will have been


roughly thirty-three hundred and the number of full citizens just over thirty-


nine hundred. Forty-seven years thereafter, in 371, in the army dispatched to


Leuctra, there were only seven hundred Spartans (Xen. Hell. 6.4.15). They


constituted two-thirds of Lacedaemon’s available citizen manpower (6.1.1),


which accords well with Aristotle’s claim (Pol. 1270a31–33) that, in his time,


twenty or so years thereafter, there were fewer than one thousand Spartans.


How, one might ask, can this development be explained without resort to the


species of analysis provided by Aristotle? How can it be explained if, in the


sixth and fifth centuries, there was a communal or quasi-communal system


of land tenure in place alongside the system of private property?

Free download pdf