The Spartan Regime_ Its Character, Origins, and Grand Strategy - Paul Anthony Rahe

(Dana P.) #1

Land Tenure in Archaic Sparta 133


colonization within Laconia, in which marginal land on the edge of the cen-


tral plain was brought into cultivation. At this time, the number of young men


at Spartan evidently exceeded the number of available allotments.


In the late fifth century, decades after the earthquakes and helot revolt, the


Spartans were extremely careful to conserve manpower (Thuc. 4.15, 108, 117,


5.15). In the late archaic period, however, they were profligate with this re-


source. In the 540s, for example, they were perfectly willing to sacrifice three


hundred men in the Battle of Champions (Hdt. 1.82), and the same was true


at the time of Thermopylae (7.205). Moreover, ca. 514, when they allowed


Dorieus to mount a colonial expedition, there was apparently no shortage of


citizens willing to join in, and no measures were taken to prevent their depar-


ture (5.42). That 465 marked a dramatic turning point is evident from the fact


that, in the wake of that date, the Spartans suddenly ceased to cultivate the


marginal land on the edge of the central plain.^25 What we know of the scale


and scope and what we can surmise regarding the character of the Spartan


losses in the 470s and the 460s is more than adequate to explain the dearth


of Spartan manpower in 418. Indeed, it is perfectly possible that, well before


418, the Spartan population had begun to recover. If we take the higher of the


two estimates for the size of the Spartiate force at Mantineia, the Spartan con-


tingent within the army fielded by Lacedaemon in 418 was considerably larger


than it would have been had the battle taken place forty years before. Even


if we were to opt for the lower estimate—the one that accords best with the


available evidence—there would be no need to suppose that Sparta experi-


enced a further drop in her population in the interval between the early 450s


and 418.


Of course, it is perfectly conceivable that Lacedaemon suffered another


great demographic shock at the end of the 430s and the beginning of the 420s


when the plague devastated Athens, eliminating a quarter of her cavalrymen,


a third of the city’s hoplites, and an untold proportion of Athenian rowers,


women, and children (Thuc. 2.47.3–54.5, 3.87.1–3). Thucydides (2.54.5) be-


lieved that no community within the Peloponnesus was affected by the plague


in any significant way, and this was no doubt true of Corinth, which he knew


exceptionally well.^26 But we are told by the geographer Pausanias (2.32.6,


8.41.7–9, 10.11.5) that the plague struck Troezen and Cleonae and that it also


threatened Phigaleia deep in Arcadia. Moreover, it is clear from Thucydides’


testimony concerning the size of the Lacedaemonian forces at Mantineia


(5.68.2) that the Spartans were secretive in the extreme, especially when it

Free download pdf