Chapter 4 Teaching Science as Inquiry
tHE tEACHING OF SCIENCE: 21 st-CENTURY PERSPECTIVES 87
Some Research Worth Noting
This section presents some research supporting the proposal to teach science as
inquiry. I criticize a contemporary view supporting direct instruction and estab-
lish a linkage among research, instruction, and inquiry.
A Definition of Inquiry
Inquiry as presented in science education has several different and quite distinc-
tive meanings. Beginning with a definition that I developed using a common
dictionary form will help set the parameters for further discussion.
In.quir.y In ́ kwir ́ e-) n., pl. ies. 1. An outcome of science teaching that is
characterized by knowledge and understanding of the processes and
methods of science. 2. Outcomes of science teaching that refer to specific
skills and abilities integral to the processes and methods of science. 3. The
instructional strategies used to achieve students’ knowledge and understanding
of science concepts, principles, and facts and/or the outcomes described in
the aforementioned definitions 1 and 2.
This short statement differentiates between inquiry as teaching strategies and
inquiry as the learning outcomes of a science teacher. The distinction between
teaching strategy and learning outcome is not as clear as the headings indicate
because teaching science as inquiry requires some use of inquiry-oriented strate-
gies and inevitable results in learning outcomes associated with knowledge and
understanding or skills and abilities.
Historically, there always have been individuals and groups advocating
different strategies for teaching science. On one end of a continuum is direct
instruction. Lecture serves as the example of this teaching method. At the other
end of this continuum is full, unguided inquiry. The extreme position in this
view is that students must discover scientific knowledge themselves without
any guidance from the teacher. In reality, most science teaching is somewhere
in the middle of the continuum. Effective science teaching embodies a variety
of strategies and methods. One difficulty, however, is that terms such as direct
instruction and inquiry learning often are argued from either/or positions.
the Inquiry Synthesis Project
The Education Development Center (EDC) in Boston completed an exten-
sive review of qualitative and quantitative research on inquiry. Known as the
“Inquiry Synthesis Project,” the research team reviewed research between 1984
and 2002 to answer the central question of the project: What is the impact of
inquiry science instruction on student outcomes?
Methodology for the project consisted of three phases: report collection,
coding, and analysis. An initial review identified 443 research reports, of which
Copyright © 2010 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to http://www.nsta.org/permissions.