The Economics Book

(Barry) #1

58 FREE MARKET ECONOMICS


Smith described the ways in which
labor, landowners, and capital (here
invested in the horses and plow) work
together to keep the economic system
moving and growing.


collapsed in Eastern Europe because
central planning failed to deliver the
goods that people wanted. Some
criticisms of Smith’s first point have
been raised, such as the fact that
the market might only provide the
goods that are wanted by the rich;
it ignores the desires of the poor. It
also responds to harmful desires—
the market can feed drug addiction
and promote obesity.


Fair prices
Second, Smith said that the market
system generates prices that are
“fair.” He believed that all goods
have a natural price that reflects
only the efforts that went into
making them. The land used in
making a product should earn its
natural rent. The capital used in its
manufacture should earn its natural
profit. The labor used should earn
its natural wage. Market prices and
rates of return can differ from their
natural levels for periods of time, as
might happen in times of scarcity.


In that case, opportunities for gain
will arise, and prices will increase,
but only until competition brings
new firms into the market and
prices fall back to their natural
level. If one industry begins to
suffer a slump in demand, prices
will drop and wages will fall, but
as a different industry rises, it will
offer higher wages to attract
workers. In the long run, Smith
says, “market” and “natural” rates
will be the same: modern
economists call this equilibrium.
Competition is essential if
prices are to be fair. Smith attacked
the monopolies occurring under the
mercantilist system, which
demanded that governments
should control foreign trade. When
there is only one supplier of a
good, the firm that supplies it can
permanently hold the price above
its natural level. Smith said that
if there are 20 grocers selling a
product, the market is more
competitive than if there are just
two. With effective competition
and low barriers to entry into a
market—which Smith also said
was essential—prices tend to be
lower. Much of this underlies
mainstream economists’ views

Consumption is the
sole end and purpose
of all production.
Adam Smith

about competition, although
dissenters, such as Austrian-
American economist Joseph
Schumpeter (p.149), would later
say that innovation can also lower
prices, even where there appears to
be little competition. As inventors
come forward to provide higher
quality products at lower prices,
they blow away existing firms in
a storm of creative destruction.

Fair incomes
Smith also argued that market
economies provide incomes that
are fair and can be spent on goods
in a sustainable “circular flow,”
Free download pdf