The History Book

(Tina Sui) #1
245
See also: The signing of the Declaration of Independence 204–07 ■ The storming of the Bastille 208–13 ■
The 1848 revolutions 228–29 ■ The California Gold Rush 248–49 ■ The opening of Ellis Island 250–51

well as a turning point in which
the outnumbered, outgunned, yet
improbably successful Southern
army led by Robert E. Lee, the
Army of Northern Virginia, suffered
its first major defeat.

The causes of the war
The American Civil War was not
simply a war about slavery; it was
a war about whether so divisive an
issue could be allowed to break up
the United States. The United
States, as Lincoln said, was a nation
“conceived in liberty and dedicated

to the proposition that all men are
created equal,” yet its Southern
states had a population of almost
4 million black slaves. Under the
constitution of the United States,
they were legally owned property.
For the abolitionists of the rapidly
industrializing north—always
a minority, but still exceedingly
vocal—slavery was morally
repugnant and an outrage against
their Christian sensibilities.
However, slavery was not just
the backbone of the agricultural
prosperity of the Southern states;

CHANGING SOCIETIES


The Battle of Gettysburg took place
in 1863. After three days of fighting
and the death of more than 7,000
soldiers, the Confederate army was
forced to retreat.

Abraham Lincoln When he arrived in Washington in
February 1861 for his presidential
inauguration, Abraham Lincoln
(1809–65) was widely dismissed
in political circles as an ignorant,
socially awkward backwoodsman.
By the time of his assassination
just four years later, he had come
to dominate America. Lincoln
had not just won the Civil War,
but he had also established
himself as a kind of irresistible
political oracle.
Born in a log cabin in Kentucky,
Lincoln qualified as a lawyer
by his late 20s. He became an
increasingly articulate champion

of what would emerge as the
anti-slavery Republican party.
Despite having no military
experience, Lincoln proved
an increasingly shrewd judge
of how the Civil War should
best be fought, actively arguing
in favor of General Grant.
He never lost sight of his
wider aims: the maintenance
of American liberties and the
essential dignity of humanity.
He pushed on with the war
with unflinching determination,
yet he understood precisely
what loss of life on the scale
of the Civil War meant.

for slave-owning Southerners, it
was a right. For them, “liberty” had
an additional meaning: the liberty
to possess slaves.
The disagreement underlined
the question over States’ Rights—
the extent to which the rights of
individual states trumped the
authority of the federal, or central,
government in Washington. This
question repeatedly resurfaced as
territories in the west were settled
and sought admission to the Union:
would they be slave or “free” states?
The 1820 Missouri Compromise
stated that slavery would be allowed
only in new states south of a line
extending westward from the
southern border of Missouri. It
was later agreed that the settlers
of new states should decide for
themselves whether theirs would
be free or slave states—a decision
that was reinforced by the ❯❯

US_244-247_Gettysburg.indd 245 16/02/2016 16:38

Free download pdf