266
INTELLIGENCE
IS A MORAL
CATEGORY
THEODOR ADORNO (1903–1969)
IN CONTEXT
BRANCH
Ethics
APPROACH
Frankfurt School
BEFORE
1st century CE Saint Paul
writes about being a “fool
for Christ.”
500–1450 The idea of the
“holy fool”, who represents an
alternative view of the world,
becomes popular throughout
Medieval Europe.
20th century The global
rise of differing forms of
mass-media communication
raises new ethical questions.
AFTER
1994 Portuguese neuroscientist
Antonio Damasio publishes
Descartes’ Error: Emotion,
Reason, and the Human Brain.
21st century Slavoj Žižek
explores the political, social,
and ethical dimensions of
popular culture.
T
he idea of the holy fool has
a long tradition in the West,
dating all the way back to
Saint Paul’s letter to the Corinthians
in which he asks his followers to be
“fools for Christ’s sake.” Throughout
the Middle Ages this idea was
developed into the popular cultural
figure of the saint or sage who was
foolish or lacked intelligence, but
who was morally good or pure.
In his book Minima Moralia, the
German philosopher Theodor Adorno
calls into question this long tradition.
He is suspicious of attempts to (as
he puts it) “absolve and beatify the
blockhead”, and wants to make the
case that goodness involves our
entire being, both our feeling and
our understanding.
The problem with the idea of
the holy fool, Adorno says, is that
it divides us into different parts,
and in doing so makes us incapable
of acting judiciously at all. In reality,
judgement is measured by the
extent to which we manage to
make feeling and understanding
cohere. Adorno’s view implies that
evil acts are not just failures of
feeling, but also failures of
intelligence and understanding.
Intelligence Emotion
So to act morally I need to
be able to use my intelligence
as well as my emotions.
Both are needed for me
to make judgements about
what is right and wrong.
Intelligence is a
moral category.