contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive
Psychology , 41 (1), 49–100.
Moro, A. (2014). On the similarity between syntax and actions. Trends in Cognitive
Science, 18 , 109–110
Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and
mMotiva tion, 51 , 45–100.
Oberauer, K. (2013). The focus of attention in working memory – From metaphors
to mec hanisms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7 , 673.
Öztekin, I., & McElree, B. (2007). Retrieval dynamics of proactive interference: PI
sl ows retrieval by eliminating fast assessments of familiarity. Journal of Memory
and Language, 57 , 126–149.
Petkov, C. I., & Jarvis, E. D. (2012). Birds, primates, and spoken language origins:
Be havioral phenotypes and neurobiological substrates. Frontiers in Evolutionary
Neuroscience, 4 , 12.
Phillips, C. (2013). Parser-grammar relations: We don’t understand everything twice.
In San M., Laka I., Tanenhaus M. K. (eds.). Language Down the Garden Path:
The Cognitiv e and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structure, 294–315. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Poeppel, D., & Embick, D. (2005). Defi ning the relation between linguistics and
neurosci e nce. In Cutler A. (ed.). Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four
Cornerstones, 103–118. Mahwah: NJ: Four Cornerstones.
Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and
brain. Neuros cience, 139 (1), 23–38.
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the sh ort-term recall of
sentences. J ournal of Memory and Language, 29 (6), 633–654.
Pulvermüller, F. (2010). Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: Discrete com-
binatorial mech anisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain Language, 112 ,
167–179.
Pulvermüller, F. (2014). The syntax of action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18,
219–220.
Rose nberg, R. D., & Feigenson, L. (2013). Infants hierarchically organize memory
representatio ns. Developmental Science, 16 (4), 610–621.
Roux, F., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2014). Working memory and neural oscillations: Alpha –
gamma versus theta – gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 18 (1), 16–25.
Rowe, J. B., Toni, I., Josephs, O., Frackowiak, R. S., & Passingham, R. E. (2000).
The prefrontal cortex: Response selection or maintenance within working memory?
Science, 288 (5471), 1656–1660.
Rubin, R. D., Watson, P. D., Duff, M. C., & Cohen, N. J. (2014). The role of the
hippocampus in fl e xible cognition and social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neu-
roscience, 8 , 742.
Shanahan, M. (2012). The brain’s connective core and its role in animal cognition.
Philosophical Tr ansactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367 (1603),
2704–2714.
Shivde, G. S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2004). Dissociating semantic and phono-
logical maintenance us ing fMRI. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,
4 , 10–19.
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science,
10 (1), 89–96.
126 Gonzalo Castillo