Rhythm Types and the Speech of Working-Class Youth in a Banlieue of Paris 109
Table 4.3
Linear Regression Coef
¿ cients with Eight Predictor Variables and “ethnicity” (AF or EF) as Outcome Variable
37
Pearson correlation coef
¿ cients
(*p<.05, **p<.001)
ethnicity
N of
segments in phrase
articulatory
rate
%V
ǻV
ǻCgradeGPA
individual speaker
ethnicity EF (1) AF (2)
1.000
.184*
.323**
-.053
.080
-.004
-.459**
-.234**
.580**
N segments in phrase
.184**
1.000
.280**
-.245**
-.107
.045
-.158*
.064
.106
articulatory rate
.323**
.280
1.000
-.219**
-.321**
-.256**
-.278**
.164**
.205**
%V
-.053
-.245**
-.219*
1.000
.297**
-.125*
.136*
-.284**
-.070
ǻV
.080
-.107
-.321**
.297**
1.000
.109
-.096
.068
.058
ǻC
-.004
.045
-.256**
-.125*
.109
1.000
.050
.052
-.092
age (as grade in school)
-.459**
-.158*
-.278**
.136**
-.096
.050
1.000
.114
-.841**
GPA (
moyenne générale
)
-.234**
.064
.164**
-.284*
.068
.052
.114
1.000
-.357**
individual speaker
.580**
.106
.205**
-.070
.058
-.092
-.841**
-.357**
1.000