296 Jan Nuyts
qualifications with speaker commitment. But they are in any case fully sub-
ject to the latter, as is obvious from the fact that in linguistic expression they
can be affected by any qualification in the layered system with speaker
commitment. A descriptive epistemic qualification, for instance, can be
qualified by the speaker for aspect, time, deontic modality, epistemic mo-
dality, etc.References
Bock, Kathryn and Willem J.M. Levelt
1994 Language production: Grammatical encoding. In: Morton Ann
Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Aca-
demic Press, 945–984.
Bock, Kathryn, Helga Loebell and Randal Morey
1992 From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic
cleft. Psychological Review 99: 150–171.
Dik, Simon C.
1986 On the notion “functional explanation”. Belgian Journal of Linguis-
tics 1: 11–52.
1987 Linguistically motivated knowledge representation. In: Makoto Na-
gao (ed.), Language and Artificial Intelligence, 145–170. Amster-
dam: North-Holland.
1989a Towards a unified cognitive language. In: Frieda J. Heyvaert and F.
Steurs (eds), Worlds behind Words, 97–110. Leuven: Leuven Uni-
versity Press.
1989b The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1. Dordrecht: Foris.
1997 The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The Structure of the
Clause. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1977 Topics in lexical semantics. In: Roger W. Cole (ed.), Current Issues
in Linguistic Theory, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica
6: 222–254.
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hengeveld, Kees
1989 Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics
25: 127–157.
Hickmann, Maya, Christian Champaud and Dominique Bassano
1993 Pragmatics and metapragmatics in the development of epistemic
modality. First Language 13: 359–389.