Although it is important to note that each region will have different genetic
activities, since the breeding and taming of oxen linked to agrarian tasks in
America came after the arrival of Hernán Cortés de Monroy and Pizarro
Altamirano (^) [ 22 ]. So the civilization clash would give a point of advantage
to the populations that were pioneers in the breeding of beasts of burden, so
it would not be unusual for homo sapiens inhabiting the so-called "old
world" to master the tillage of the countryside, to evolve to the quality of
being able to collide atom by homo sapiens (^) [ 23 ]. And it is in this old world
that philosophy constructs the academic form of evolutionary history. Let
us think in Marxist terms, where perhaps an ancestral memory of drought
and famine is hidden, but the semantic inversion is also paradoxical.
In the Grundrisse (^) [ 24 ] Marx went so far as to develop those
conceptions and elements that develop the roots of capital itself and of
social labour, i.e. production and the capital-labour relation. Marx states
with crudeness and masterly certainty that a people reaches the peak of its
industrial development when the focus is no longer on profit, but on
earning. Applying materialism, he notes that the different specific objective
conditions of societies determine social production, climatic, geographical,
traditional, psychographic, etc. factors. So we can make the following
distinction present in Marx to reach to interpret the field of art:
- communal ownership
- four alternative forms which follow from the
previous one: Asiatic, Slavic, Germanic and
ancient.
- Feudal
- Capitalist