Table 2.6.
Babylonian intercalations in the Parthian period
(a
) Early Parthian period (142/1
- 88/7
BCE
), from cuneiform sources
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14
15
16 17
18 19
Year 1 of cycle
VI
a 2
XII
2
139/8
XII
2
XII
2
(XII
) 2
XII
2
VI
b 2
VI
2
120/19
XII
2
101/0
XII
2
XII
c 2
(b
) Middle Parthian period (26/5
BCE
- 78/9
CE
), from numismatic sources (after Assar 2003)
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
12 13 14
15
16 17
18 19
(XII
) 2
BCE
25/4
6/5
XII
2
CE
14/15
33/4
(XII
)VI 2
2
(XII
) 2
52/3
(XII
) 2
(XII
) 2
71/2
(XII
) 2
aYear 142/1, in Sachs and Hunger (1988
- iii. 128
- 9 (year astronomically identi
fied) and Neugebauer (1955) ii. 442
- 3 (with also the next entry).
bThe previous entry (for 126/5, in year 14), which conforms to the Saros Canon cycle, is attested in BM 45629 (= CT 49: 143). The present entry (for 125/4),
which suggests an
intercalation six months later, is inferred from the date VI
(Ululu 1) in BM 33018 (text 21 in Hochberg 1998: 117 1
- 20).
cYear 88/7
BCE
, the latest dated intercalation attested in cuneiform sources (in Sachs and Hunger 1988
- 2006 iii).
Notes to Table 2.6 (b)
: Entries in brackets indicate intercalations where the month name is not speci
fied; Assar assumes in all cases XII
, but only on the basis of the Saros Canon 2
cycle.
Assar argues that the Seleucid Era assumed in Parthian coins begins in autumn 312
BCE
, as in Macedonian practice, and thus that all years begin in the autumn (more precisely in
Babylonian month VII; Babylonian cuneiform sources assume a Seleucid Era beginning six months later, in the spring of 311
BCE
;see further Chapter 5). This table follows Assar in
this respect, but for the sake of consistency with Table 2.6(
a) and previous tables in this chapter, I have converted the data in such a way that years run from spring to spring (month
I to month XII).
Not included in the table is a tetradrachm from the reign of Orodes II (57
-^38
BCE
), dated Gorpaios
embolimos
(VI
) but without the year. Assuming the Saros cycle, the year could 2
only have been 47
BCE
. In any event, this is the earliest evidence of intercalation on Parthian coins (Assar 2003: 178).