Edwards, C. 1996. Writing Rome: Textual approaches to the city.Cambridge.
Eigler, U., U. Gotter, N. Luraghi, and U. Walter, eds. 2003. Formen römischer
Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen, Autoren, Kontexte.
Stuttgart.
Elias, N. 1992. Time: An essay.Trans. E. Jephcott. Oxford.
Errington, R. M. 1989. Rome and Greece to 205 b.c.CAH^2 8: 81 – 106.
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome: Local tradition and imperial power.
Oxford.
Evans, R. 2003. Searching for paradise: Landscape, utopia, and Rome. Arethusa36:
285–307.
Fabian, J. 1983. Time and the other: How anthropology makes its object.New York.
Fantham, E. 1981. The synchronistic chapter of Gellius (NA17.21) and some aspects
of Roman chronology and cultural history between 60 and 50 b.c.LCM6: 7 – 17.
———. 1985. Ovid, Germanicus, and the composition of the Fasti. PLLS5: 243 – 81.
———. 1997. Images of the city: Propertius’ new-old Rome. In Habinek and
Schiesaro 1997, 122 – 35.
Farrell, J. 1995. The structure of Lucretius’ “Anthropology.” MD33: 81 – 95.
———. 2001. Latin language and Latin culture from ancient to modern times.
Cambridge.
Feeney, D. 1984. The reconciliations of Juno. CQ34: 179 – 94.
———. 1986. Stat magni nominis umbra: Lucan on the greatness of Pompeius Mag-
nus. CQ36: 239 – 43.
———. 1991. The gods in epic: Poets and critics of the classical tradition.Oxford.
———. 1992a. “Shall I compare thee... ?” Catullus 68 and the limits of analogy. In
Author and audience in Latin literature,ed. A. J. Woodman and J. Powell, 33 – 44.
Cambridge.
———. 1992b. Si licet et fas est:Ovid ’s Fastiand the problem of free speech under
the principate. In Powell 1992, 1 – 25.
———. 1993. Horace and the Greek lyric poets. In Horace 2000, a celebration: Essays
for the bimillennium,ed. N. Rudd, 41 – 63. London.
———. 1998. Literature and religion at Rome: Cultures, contexts, and beliefs.
Cambridge.
———. 1999. Mea tempora:Patterning of time in the Metamorphoses.In Hardie,
Barchiesi, and Hinds 1999, 13 – 30.
———. 2002. The odiousness of comparisons: Horace on literary history and the
limitations of synkrisis. In Horace and Greek literary poetry,ed. M. Paschalis, 7 – 18.
Rethymnon.
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and society in Livy’s History.Berkeley and Los Angeles.
———. 2003. Cicero and the invention of “literary” history. In Eigler et al. 2003,
196 – 212.
Bibliography. 311