- Timothy K. Nenninger, ‘American Military Effectiveness in the First World War’, in
Allan R. Millet and Williamson Murray (eds.),Military Effectiveness: Volume I: The
First World War(Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, 1987), 129–30. - David Trask, ‘The Entry of the USA into the War and its Effects’, in Hew Strachan
(ed.),World War I: A History(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 239–52. - Allan R. Millett, ‘Cantigny, 28–31 May 1918’, in Charles E. Heller and William A. Stofft
(eds.),America’s First Battles, 1776–1965(Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas,
1986), 149–85.
14.American Military History, 398. - Ibid., 399.
- Trask, ‘Entry of USA into the War’, 43.
17.American Military History, 403. - Nenninger, ‘American Military Effectiveness’, 141.
- Millett, ‘Cantigny’, 180–1.
- Nenninger, ‘American Military Effectiveness’, 129.
- Ronal Spector, ‘The Military Effectiveness of the U.S. Armed Forces, 1919–1939’, in
Allan R. Millet and Williamson Murray (eds.),Military Effectiveness: Volume II: The
Interwar Period(Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, 1990), 72. - William O. Odom,After the Trenches: The Transformation of the U.S. Army, 1918–1939
(College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, 1999). - Ibid., 121.
- General Service Schools,General Tactical Functions of Larger Units(Ft. Leavenworth,
KS: General Service Schools, 1926), 1–2; cf. Nelson, ‘Origins of Operational Art’, 340.
25.General Tactical Functions, 3; cf. Nelson, ‘Origins of Operational Art’, 340.
26.The Principles of Strategy for an Independent Corps or Army in a Theater of Operations
(Ft. Leavenworth, KS: Command and General Staff College, 1936), 37. - William K. Naylor,The Principles of Strategy(Ft. Leavenworth, KS: General Service
Schools, 1920); cf. Col. (ret.) Michael R. Matheny, ‘The Roots of American Opera-
tional Art’ (unpublished paper). - Naylor,Principles, 49, 106.
- Williamson Murray, ‘Strategic Bombing: The British, American, and German Experi-
ences’, inMilitary Innovation, 107. - Ibid., 115.
- Ibid., 123–5; Phillip S. Meilinger,Paths of Heaven: The Evolution of Airpower Theory
(Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University Press, 1997). - Murray, ‘Strategic Bombing’, 126; and Richard R. Muller, ‘Close Air Support:
The German, British, and American Experiences, 1918–1941’, inMilitary Innovation,
144–90. - Murray, ‘Strategic Bombing’, 127.
- Tami Davis Biddle,Rhetoric and Reality in Air Warfare: The Evolution of British and
American Ideas about Strategic Bombing, 1914–1945(Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer-
sity Press, 2002). - Holger H. Herwig, ‘Innovation Ignored: The Submarine Problem—Germany, Britain,
and the United States, 1919–1939’, inMilitary Innovation, 154. - Ibid., 255–6.
- Geoffrey Till, ‘Adopting the Aircraft Carrier: The British, American, and Japanese Case
Studies’, inMilitary Innovation, 191–226. - Barry Watts and Williamson Murray, ‘Military Innovation in Peacetime’, inMilitary
Innovation, 399–400.
162 The Evolution of Operational Art