Justice among Nations. A History of International Law - Stephen C. Neff

111. Torbjørn K nutsen, A History of International Relations Th eory, 2nd ed. (Man-
     chester: Manchester University Press, 1997), 193; Paul Guggenheim, “International Re-
     lations and Public International Law,” in Paul Guggenheim and Pitman B. Potter, Th e
     Science of International Law, International Relations, and Or ga ni za tion, 7– 19 (Geneva:
     Geneva Research Centre, 1940), 7– 8; and Chris Brown and Kirsten Ainley, Understand-
     ing International Relations, 4th ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 19– 23.


112. Christian Reus- Smit, “Th e Strange Death of Liberal International Th eory,” 12
     EJIL 573– 93 (2001), 577. On the early years of the discipline, see Knutsen, History,
     211– 16.


113. See generally Nicolas Politis, La neutralité et la paix (Paris: Hachette, 1935).


114. See Lauterpacht, Private Law Sources, 51– 71.


115. Hersch Lauterpacht, “Th e Grotian Tradition in International Law,” 23 BYBIL
     1– 53 (1946), 4– 5.


116. Hersch Lauterpacht, “Règles générales du droit de la paix,” 62 RdC 95– 422
     (1937), 10 4.


117. Ibid., 126– 28.


118. See Chapter 7.


119. See La Pradelle, Maîtres et doctrines, 423– 40.


120. Dietrich Schindler, “Contribution à l’étude des facteurs sociologiques et psy-
     chologiques du droit international,” 46 RdC 229– 326 (1933).


121. Wolfgang Friedmann, “Th e Disintegration of Eu ro pe an Civilisation and the
     Future of International Law: Some Observations on the Social Foundations of Law,” 2
     MLR 194– 214 (1938), 213.


122. Nicolas Politis, Th e New Aspects of International Law (Washington, DC: Carn-
     egie Endowment for International Peace, 1928), 15.


123. Ibid., 4.


124. Ibid., 8– 12.


125. Ibid., 11– 14.


126. Georges Scelle, Précis de droit des gens: Principes et systématique, vol. 1 (Paris:
     Sirey, 1932), 4.


127. Ibid., 5.


128. Ibid., 35– 37.


129. Ibid., 37– 42.


130. Ibid., 55– 57.


131. See Antonio Cassese, “Remarks on Scelle’s Th eory of ‘Role Splitting’ (dédouble-
     ment fonctionnel) in International Law,” 1 EJIL 210– 31 (1990).


132. For Kelsen’s support, in substance, of the idea of dédoublement fonctionnel, see
     Hans Kelsen, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Th eorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag
     zu einer reinen Rechtslehre (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1920), 144– 49.


133. Georges Scelle, “Règles générales du droit de la paix,” 46 RdC 327– 703 (1933), 690.


134. Scelle, Précis, vol. 2, 547.


135. Ibid.

542 Notes to Pages 371–377