The Eurasian Triangle. Russia, the Caucasus and Japan, 1904-1945

(WallPaper) #1

The Akashi Operations Ë 37


Fig. 2.15.SteamshipSirius, Amsterdam, 1906.


and ammunition] cannot be received [in the Caucasus], this fact will scare the liberal


[sic] government of Russia into thinking of reform in Georgia. Frightened, it will tell


itself: ‘If the Georgians were able to send one boat, then they will be able to send yet


another. In this way they’ll continue their ght and organize uprisings. The Caucasus


will interfere with us at a dicult moment.’ For this reason, Russia will be forced to


think about our autonomy, as it does about autonomy in Poland and Finland.”⁶⁵


Kereselidze accepted the challenge Dekanozishvili presented to him. As in the


case of theJohn Grafton, Japan nanced the operation. By the time it actually took


place, however, Tokyo had prohibited Akashi from funding further operations.


Akashi’s assessment of the Caucasian situation had not been very encouraging to


begin with. He wrote: “During this time [of organizing the shipments of arms to the


Baltic and Caucasian regions], the conict incited by the Russians between Tatars


and Armenians had begun in Baku in the Caucasus and Shusha in Georgia, and both


provinces dissolved into total disorder.”⁶⁶(Obviously, Akashi’s grasp of the situation


was not very solid: for example, the Armenian-“Tatar” (Azeri) massacres in Baku had


65 Viktor Nozadze, “gardasrul zhamta ambavni da sakmeni” [Events and deeds of the past].kavkas-
sioni(Caucasus) (Paris) 1964, no. 9, 122–123.
66 Akashi,Rakka ryusui ̄ , 52 (translation slightly modied).

Free download pdf