- Ibid., fols. 42a, 43a, 44a.
- Gökyay, Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi, 11 7; Nihadi, Tarih-i Nihadi, fol. 1 73b.
- Kürd Hatib, Risāle, fol. 9a.
- Mantran, Istanbul, 254; Vecihi Hasan Çelebi, Tarih-i Vecihi, fols. 1 06a– 1 08a;
Silahdar, Tarih-i Silahdar, 1 :226. - Karaçelebizade, Ravzatü’l-ebrâr zeyli, 323, 325.
- Ibid., 326–28, 335.
- Kürd Hatib, Risāle, fols. 9a–b.
- Anonymous, “Chiosei Basi/Capo del Chiosero Reggie,” Staatliche Museen zu
Berlin, Preußischer Kulturbesitz, Kunstbibliothek, Lipperheide OZ 52, 66; Anonymous,
“Mehter basi/Capo d’instrumenti di Guera,” Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, Preußischer
Kulturbesitz, Kunstbibliothek, Lipperheide OZ 52, 64.
Kürd Hatib, Risāle, fols. 9b– 1 0a.
Karaçelebizade, Ravzatü’l-ebrâr zeyli, 286.
Parry, “The Period of Murād IV, 161 7–48,” 1 56.
İsmail Hakkı Uzunçarşılı’s infl uential 1 950s account of Ottoman history, ar-
ranged chronologically and divided into sultanic reigns, skipped from a section on
Ibrahim and the problems that attended his reign to “The Situation of the State be-
tween 1 648 and 1 656,” followed two sections later by “The Period of the Köprülüs.”
Uzunçarşılı, Osmanlı Tarihi 3 ( 1 ). This framework is followed in the recent work of
Turkish scholars such as Feredun Emecen, who includes the period in “The Solu-
tion Sought After for Military Success: The Köprülüs,” and in the work of American
and western European historians. These include Norman Itzkowitz, who chose “The
Köprülü Era”; Hans Kissling, who wrote an article entitled “Die Köprülü Restauration”;
Shaw, who labels a section less than ten pages long concerning the entire epoch of Me-
hmed IV in his Ottoman history as “The Köprülü Years, 1 656–83”; and, most recently,
Suraiya Faroqhi’s “Köprülü Restoration” and Caroline Finkel’s “Rule of the Grandees.”
Feridun Emecen, “From the Founding to Küçük Kaynarca,” 3–62, 49–52; Itzkowitz, Ot-
toman Empire and Islamic Tradition, 77–85, 99– 1 00; Hans Kissling, “Die Köprülü Res-
tauration,” in Internationales Kulturhistorisches symposium Mogersdorf 1969 (Eisenstadt,
Austria: 1 972), 75–84; Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire, 1 :207– 1 6; Suraiya Faroqhi,
“Crisis and Change, 1 590– 1 699,” in Suraiya Faroqhi et al., An Economic and Social
History of the Ottoman Empire, vol. 2: 1600–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1 994), 4 1 9–20; Suraiya Faroqhi, Geschichte des Osmanischen Reiches (München:
C. H. Beck, 2000), 6 1 –62, “Die Restauration der Köprülüs”; Finkel, Osman’s Dream,
253–88.
Finkel, Osman’s Dream, 253.
Kurat, “The Reign of Mehmed IV, 1 648–87,” 1 68; Silahdar, Tarih-i Silahdar,
1 :226.
Carter Vaughn Findley, The Turks in World History (New York: Oxford Univer-
sity Press, 2005), 11 9.
Naima, Tarih-i Naima, 6:403.
Imber, The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650, 324. Imber seconds Marshall Hodg-
son’s emphasis on Shariah as a glue that held Islamic societies together in times of
notes to pages 77–80 273