CLASSICAL GREEK TRADE 357
the role of the Piraeus as the principal axis of maritime trade, at least for the
Eastern Mediterranean, in the Classical period.^6
The comic writer Hermippus offers a long list of imports, some significant,
others fanciful:
From Cyrene, silphion and ox-hides; from the Hellespont, mackerel and
all kinds of salt fish; from Sitalces, itching powder for the Lacedaemonians,
and from Perdiccas, many shiploads of lies. Syracuse sends pork and
cheese, and may Poseidon sink the curved ships of the Corcyreans since
they collaborate with both sides. That is what comes from that direc-
tion. From Egypt, sails, rigging and papyrus; from Syria, incense. Crete
the Beautiful delivers cypresswood to the gods; and Libya, ivory for sale;
Rhodes, raisins and dried figs that bring pleasant dreams. From Euboea,
pears and fat sheep; slaves from Phrygia and mercenary troops from
Arcadia. Pagasae provides slaves and tattooed men; the Paphlagonians
furnish Zeus’ acorns and glistening almonds, the highpoint of the meal.
Phoenicia, palm fruit and wheat flour of the finest sort; Carthage, carpets
and decorated pillows.^7
As this oft-cited fragment of the comic poet Hermippus, dated ca. 430 BCE,
humorously reminds us, and as Erxleben has investigated in some depth,^8 the
deigma in Piraeus displayed products from Egypt and the Near East, Ionia,
Macedonia, North Africa, Carthage’s colonies, and Magna Graecia. Recent
archaeological studies, including the discovery of bucchero ware in Miletus
and Ionia,^9 and strong Etruscan influences on Archaic and Classical Greek
metalwork,^10 remind us that the Etruscans played a role in maritime trade
comparable to that of the Phoenicians and Carthaginians,^11 not just in the
Western Mediterranean, but also perhaps in the Aegean as well.^12 Moreover,
although direct evidence is scanty, we should not neglect the likely importance
of trade in a wide range of commodities, with the Thracians and the Scythians
through the Black Sea,^13 and, sometimes direct, sometimes through Etruscan
intermediaries, with Celtic Central and Western Europe.^14
Although Meyer and Beloch insisted long ago on the comparability of
Greek maritime trade to that of the late Medieval Italian, Dutch, and Hanseatic
maritime republics, this important source of comparative evidence has rarely
been analyzed or exploited to investigate the scale of ancient trade. A few
stray scraps of literary and epigraphic evidence show, however, that even at
the nadir of Athens’ fortunes, after the defeat in the Peloponnesian War, trade
into Piraeus was comparable in value (using wheat equivalents) to that of
Venice, the wealthiest and most enduring of the Renaissance mercantile and
naval powers in the Eastern Mediterranean. We know from Andocides that
the pentekoste or 2 percent tax on trade into Piraeus in 404/3 BCE yielded 36
talents, implying imports and exports subject to taxation (since some favored
traders were granted ateleia) of 1,800 talents or 10.8 million drachmas (Andoc.