804 { Notes to pages 178–189
- Lei Yingfu, Zai zuigao tongshuaibu dang canmou: Lei Ying fu huiyilu (Serving on
the staff of the high command: Memoir of General Lei Yingfu), Nanchang: Baihuazhou
wenyi chubanshe. Quoted in Garver, “China’s Decision,” p. 108. - Wang Bingnan, Zhong mei huitan jiu nian huigu (Recollection of nine years of
Sino-American talks), Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe, 1985, pp. 85–90. - Garver, “China’s Decision,” p. 115.
- Lei Yingfu memoir, quoted in Garver, “China’s Decision,” p. 120.
- The first detailed study of Establishment 22 was Kenneth Conboy and James
Morrison, The CIA’s Secret War in Tibet, Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2002, pp.
17 1– 97. - John Garver, “The Indian Factor in Recent Sino-Soviet Relations,” China Quarterly,
no. 125 (Summer 1991), pp. 55–85. - John Garver, The China-India-U.S. Triangle: Strategic Relations in the Post-Cold
War Era, Seattle, WA: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2002. - The United States, on the other hand, did not seize Chinese territory, although it
did participate in territorial “concessions” set up in China’s east coast cities. This relatively
non-aggressive history of the United States during China’s “century of national humilia-
tion” has been stressed to China by US leaders from Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman
to Richard Nixon to George H. W. Bush. On the history of Russo-Chinese relations, see
O. Edmund Clubb, China and Russia: The “Great Game,” New York: Columbia University
Press, 1971. Harry Schwartz, Tsars, Mandarins, and Commissars, New York: Doubleday
Anchor, 1973. Aitchen K. Wu, China and the Soviet Union, London: Methuen, 1950. - Accounts of the Sino-Soviet border conflict: Tai Sung An, The Sino-Soviet Territorial
Dispute, Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1973. Dennis J. Doolin, Territorial Claims in
the Sino-Soviet Conflict: Documents and Analysis, Stanford: Hoover Institution, 1965. - “Munich” here refers to the 1938 British and French sacrifice of Czechoslovakia to
Nazi Germany in hopes of satisfying Hitler’s territorial demands and thus averting war. - Quoted in An, Territorial Dispute, p. 76.
- Quoted in An, Territorial Dispute, p. 82.
- An, Territorial Dispute, p. 82.
- This section draws from William Burr and Jeffrey T. Richelson, “Whether to
‘Strangle the Baby in the Cradle,” International Security, vol. 25, no. 3 (Winter 2000/10),
pp. 54–99. Also Gordon H. Chang, Friends and Enemies: The United States, China, and the
Soviet Union, 1948–1972, Stanford University Press, 1990. - This interpretation comes from Radchenko, Two Suns, pp. 65–6.
- See Walter C. Clemens, The Arms Race and Sino-Soviet Relations, Hoover
Institution Press, 1968. Morton H. Halperin, China and the Bomb, London: Pall Mall Press, - Morton H. Halperin and Dwight H. Perkins, Communist China and Arms Control,
New York: Praeger, 1965. Alice Langley Hsieh, “The Sino-Soviet Nuclear Dialogue: 1963,”
in Sino-Soviet Military Relations, edited by Raymond L. Garthoff, New York: Praeger,
1966, pp. 150–70. - Peking Review, August 15, 1963, p. 7.
- Saturday Evening Post, September 28 and October 26, 1963. Quoted in Burr and
Richelson, Strangle, p. 74. - Wu, Shinian lunzhan, pp. 745, 753.
- Barry Naughton, “The Third Front: Defense Industrialization in the Chinese
Interior,” China Quarterly, no. 115 (September 1988), pp. 351–86.