China\'s Quest. The History of the Foreign Relations of the People\'s Republic of China - John Garver

(Steven Felgate) #1

Notes to pages 418–427 } 825



  1. Quoted in Garver, “Indian Factor,” p. 63.

  2. Garver, “India Factor,” p. 63.

  3. Peter Tomsen, The Wars of Afghanistan:  Messianic Terrorism, Tribal Conflicts,
    and the Failure of Great Powers, New  York:  Public Affairs, 2011, p.  267. Tomsen was a
    long-serving diplomat who served three years in the mid-1980s as deputy chief of the US
    mission in Beijing. Also Crile, Charlie Wilson’s War, pp. 268–89, 465–6.

  4. Yitzhak Shichor, “The Great Wall of Steel: Militancy and Strategy in Xinjiang,” in
    Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderlands, edited by S. Frederick Starr, Armonk, NY: M. E.
    Sharpe, 2004, pp. 120–60, 148–9.

  5. Shichor, “Great Wall,” pp.  148–9. Also Jeffry T.  Richelson, Foreign Intelligence
    Organizations, Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988, pp. 291–2.

  6. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p.  359. This account of the 1979–82 renegotiations follows
    Huang’s account. The text of the TRA is readily available online, for instance at http://
    http://www.ait.org.tw/en/taiwan-relations-act.html. Regarding the TRA, see Ramon A. Myers,
    ed., A Unique Relationship: The United States and the Republic of China under the Taiwan
    Relations Act, Stanford:  Hoover Institution Press, 1989. Robert L.  Dowen, The Taiwan
    Pawn in the China Game, Washington, DC:  Center for Strategic and International
    Studies, 1979.

  7. Harding, Fragile Relationship, pp. 112–3.

  8. Deng Xiaoping, “Our Principled Position on the Development of Sino-US
    Relations,” Selected Works, Vol. 2, pp. 369–72.

  9. Huang Hua, Memoirs, pp. 366–7.

  10. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p. 376,

  11. This section follows James Lilley, China Hands:  Nine Decades of Adventure,
    Espionage, and Diplomacy in Asia, New York: Public Affairs, p. 2004, p. 232. The “sum-
    mary” to Volume 2 of Richard Solomon’s 1985 study of PRC negotiating behavior said that
    the purpose of the volume was to “provide the basis for briefing senior American officials
    prior to their first negotiating encounters with PRC counterparts, establish control over
    the documentary record of US-PRC political exchanges during the ‘normalization’ phase
    of the relation.” Solomon, part II, p. v.

  12. James Mann, About Face: A History of America’s Curious Relationship with China,
    from Nixon to Clinton, New York: Knopf, 1999, pp. 124–5.

  13. Lilley, China Hands, p. 248.

  14. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p. 376.

  15. Harding, Fragile Relationship, p. 384.

  16. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p. 376.

  17. Brzezinski, Power and Principle, p. 426.

  18. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p. 365.

  19. Huang Hua, Memoirs, pp. 364–8.

  20. Huang Hua, Memoirs, p. 378.

  21. Dating the PRC-US strategic partnership is problematic. Either 1972 or 1979 can
    be seen as starting points. Selection of 1982 as end point reflects Beijing’s adoption of its
    “independent foreign policy” and George Shultz’s more skeptical approach to the utility
    of triangular linkage. From another perspective, however, the strategic partnership con-
    tinued all the way to spring 1989.

Free download pdf