Chapter 9 Learning and Conditioning 319
punishment) or if studying makes you lose time
with your friends (negative punishment), you may
stop studying:
Positive
punishment:
Ridicule by
friends
Result:
Studying
decreases
Behavior:
Studying
Negative
punishment:
Loss of time
with friends
The distinction between positive and negative
reinforcement and punishment has been a source
of confusion for generations of students, turn-
ing many strong minds to mush. You will master
these terms more quickly if you understand that
“positive” and “negative” have nothing to do with
“good” or “bad.” They refer to whether something
is given or taken away. In the case of reinforce-
ment, think of a positive reinforcer as something
that is added or obtained (imagine a plus sign) and
a negative reinforcer as avoidance of, or escape
from, something unpleasant (imagine a minus
sign). In either case, a response becomes more likely.
Do you recall what happened when Little Albert
learned to fear rats through a process of classical
conditioning? After he acquired this fear, crawling
away was negatively reinforced by escape from
the now-fearsome rodent. The negative reinforce-
ment that results from escaping or avoiding some-
thing unpleasant explains why so many fears are
long-lasting. When you avoid a feared object or
situation, you also cut off all opportunities to ex-
tinguish your fear.
Understandably, people often confuse nega-
tive reinforcement with positive punishment, be-
cause both involve an unpleasant stimulus. With
punishment, you are subjected to the unpleasant
stimulus; with negative reinforcement, you escape
from it or avoid it. To keep these terms straight,
remember that punishment, whether positive or
negative, decreases the likelihood of a response;
and reinforcement, whether positive or negative,
increases it. In real life, punishment and negative
reinforcement often go hand in hand. If you use
a chain collar to teach your dog to heel, a brief
being paired with primary reinforcers and pun-
ishers. (If that reminds you of classical condition-
ing, reinforce your excellent thinking with a pat
on the head! Indeed, secondary reinforcers and
punishers are often called conditioned reinforcers
and punishers.) As a secondary reinforcer, money
has considerable power over most people’s be-
havior because it can be exchanged for primary
reinforcers such as food and shelter. It is also as-
sociated with other secondary reinforcers, such as
praise and respect.
Positive and Negative Reinforcers and
Punishers. In our example of the begging dog,
something pleasant (getting the lamb chop) fol-
lowed the dog’s begging response, so the response
increased. Similarly, if you get a good grade af-
ter studying, your efforts to study are likely to
continue or increase. This kind of process, in
which a pleasant consequence makes a response
more likely, is known as positive reinforcement. But
there is another type of reinforcement, negative
reinforcement, which involves the removal of some-
thing unpleasant. Negative reinforcement occurs
when you escape from something aversive or avoid
it by preventing it from ever occurring. If some-
one nags you to study but stops nagging when you
comply, your studying is likely to increase because
you will then avoid the nagging:
A+A+
Positive
reinforcer:
Good grade
Negative
reinforcer:
Nagging
ceases
Result:
Studying
increases
Behavior:
Studying
Likewise, negative reinforcement occurs when tak-
ing a pill eliminates your pain or when you take a
certain route across campus to avoid a rude person.
The positive–negative distinction can also
be applied to punishment: Something unpleas-
ant may occur following some behavior (positive
punishment), or something pleasant may be re-
moved (negative punishment). For example, if your
friends tease you for being an egghead (positive
positive reinforcement
A reinforcement proce-
dure in which a response
is followed by the presen-
tation of, or increase in
intensity of, a reinforcing
stimulus; as a result,
the response becomes
stronger or more likely to
occur.
negative reinforce-
ment A reinforcement
procedure in which a
response is followed by
the removal, delay, or
decrease in intensity of
an unpleasant stimulus;
as a result, the response
becomes stronger or more
likely to occur.