THE NEXT BIG STEPS FOR SCIENCE
AL
AM
Y,^ G
ET
TY
THE EXISTENCE OF
BLACK HOLES
The idea of ‘dark stars’ that gobble up any planets in their path
dates back to the 18th century. But, as Brian Clegg explains, it
wasn’t until 1964 that hard evidence of their existence emerged
B
lack holes have escaped from
astrophysics into the everyday
imagination. But there are gaps
in our knowledge of their nature and
even, possibly, their existence.
Black holes were born from theory,
not observation. We have known about
conventional stars for as long as we’ve
been able to look at a clear night sky
but no-one ever saw a black hole.
Instead, t hey were predicted to exist
at a time when there was no way of
checking whether there was any such
thing out there. And that prediction
happened not once, but twice.
The first inspired thinking on the
matter was in the 18th century. The
man who dreamed up what he called
‘dark stars’ was John Michell, a
scientist who became a clergyman. It
was from his rectory that he came up
with the concept, combining two key
ideas of the latest science at the time.
One was escape velocity. Michell
k new t hat when a bullet is shot
st raight up into t he air, it has just two
forces acting on it once it leaves t he
gun: air resistance and gravity. As
it gets higher, bot h of t hese forces
weaken. The air gets thinner and,
as New ton had made clea r, gravity’s
attraction drops off with the square of
the distance between the centres of the
bodies involved – in this case, the
bullet and the Earth.
A typical bullet from the black
powder guns of Michell’s day could
t ravel as fast as 300 met res per second.
But despite this impressive velocity,
t he forces acting to slow it brought t he
bullet back dow n to Ea r t h. Michell,
though, knew that a bullet travelling
about 37 times faster would be able to
overcome the Earth’s attraction and fly
off into space – it would have achieved
escape velocity. He combined t his idea
with a discovery from the 1670s, when
Danish astronomer Ole Rømer realised
that an apparent variation in the
timing of Jupiter’s moons was caused
by the varying time that light took to
reach us from the planet.
Light conversation
Ever since ancient times, there had
been arguments over whether light
travelled instantly or just extremely
quickly. Rømer found evidence for a
measurable speed, as the changing
relative positions of Jupiter and Earth
in their orbits varied the time that
light took to reach us. He calculated
the speed of light to be around
220,000km/s. In the following 100
yea rs, t his f igu re was measu red
more accu rately so t hat Michell was
working with something closer to our
current 300,000km/s. But the specific
value didn’t matter – the point was
that light had a speed.
Combining the two concepts of
escape velocity and light having a
finite speed, Michell wondered what
would happen if a massive star had an
escape velocity that was above the
speed of light. The more mass in a
body, the higher its escape velocity.
Therefore, in principle, there could
be a sta r so vast t hat even light would
not escape from it. Such a ‘dark star’
would have to be immense. Even
though the escape velocity from the
surface of the Sun, for instance, is over
600km/s, it is still far lower than the
speed of light. Michell’s theory was 5
Ole Rømer calculated a speed for light,
settling the dispute over whether it
travelled instantly or just very quickly