compounds known to induce robust and wide-
spread intracellular signaling in each system
( 8 ). Systemic injection of raclopride (RAC; a
D2-receptor antagonist) todrd2-eGFP mice
induced a strong nucleosomal response mostly
in D2-SPNs that extended throughout the pos-
terior striatum, whereas GBR12783 (GBR; a DA-
transporter inhibitor) induced an even stronger
activation with similar distribution but mostly
in D1-SPNs (Fig. 3A). We injected four groups
ofdrd2-eGFP mice with different combina-
tions of vehicle, RAC (t=0),andGBR(t=15)
andrecordedtheirambulatorylocomotorac-
tivity in an open field arena prior to perfusion(t= 30) (Fig. 3B). GBR injection strongly in-
creased locomotion in both groups that re-
ceived it, irrespective of the RAC injection (Fig. 3,
C to G, and table S3). In RAC-treated mice,
taD2-SPNs dominated most of the striatal space
(Fig. 3, H and I), whereas a reverse pattern
was observed after GBR treatment (Fig. 3, HMatamaleset al.,Science 367 , 549–555 (2020) 31 January 2020 3of7
Training days
Lever Press
Mag check020406005101520Training daysCluster:taD2-DPN
taD1-SPNACBEFDGHIJLKMNO500 μmAAV-FLEx-
taCasp3-TEVpadora2a-Cre::drd2-eGFP
DARPP-32
eGFPDARPP-32eGFPMerge0 3 6 9 12 15MagExtinction
CRF FR5 FR10InstrumentalCumulative presses Extinction
04812 20
Minutes% of D2Ratio D2/D1Ratio D1/D2% of D1InstrumentalExtinction
16Press/minInstrlExtInstrumental
Extinctionn.s.n.s.IAI (n+1)IAI (n)0.1 1 10 100
0.110
3050Press/min^101Sham
100LesionedIAI (n+1)IAI (n)0.1 1 10 100
0.110
110003691215MagExtinction
learning
CRF FR5 FR10EC3050Press/min^10Cumulative presses
0510MinCumulative presses
0 5 10 15 20Sham
LP rate Lesioned LP rateSlp Slp
p = .1361 p < .0001# presses3 sec^080(Ø)# presses3 sec 080Sham Lesioned (Ø)Extinction Learning TestMinOverlapOverlap (% of D1)taD2-SPN densitytaD1-SPN densitySham LesionedSham Lesioned Sham
LesionedOverlapShamLesionedDMSTraining days0 5 10 150 5 10 15n.s.n.s.TestLD#1
#2
#3Overlap
areasExclusionExclusion2040020400D1-SPND2-SPN
D1-SPND2-SPNEF-1α
TEVp taCasp3T2A
FLEx500 px
xy 500 px
xy 01326395265040801.20.00612
2006008004000 203040501003004002000100300400200005002004080Instrumental
ExtinctionInstrumental
ExtinctionFig. 2. Functional confluence of projection systems in the striatum
promotes extinction of learned actions.(A) Mice (eight per group) were
trained on increasing fixed ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules prior to
extinction (day 16). (B) Cumulative and average lever press performance during
instrumental (control) and extinction sessions (day 16). (C) Distribution of
taD2- and taD1-SPNs in the posterior striatum of mice in (B). Plots show up to
three density clusters from aligned hemisections in each group (4044 SPNs
mapped). (D) Reconstruction of taD2- and taD1-SPN overlapping territories in
the striatum. (EandF) Extent of taD2- and taD1-SPN territory exclusion. Data
are percentages of taD2-SPN territories segregated from taD1-SPNs (E) and
vice versa (F). Insets: overall D2/D1 (E) and D1/D2 (F) P-H3+SPN ratios.
(G) Genetic lesion of D2-SPNs in the DMS through AAV-FLEx-taCasp3-TEVp
system. DARPP-32+-eGFP-SPNs remained intact (fig. S4A). (H)Shamand
Lesioned mice were trained as in (A) but underwent additional extinction
testing on day 17. (I) Lever press performance in both groups across
instrumental training. Right: return maps of collective IAIs on day 15.
(JandK) Cumulative presses per minute on days 16 (J) and 17 (K). Insets:
average press performance (top) and linear regression slope (Slp) analysis
(bottom). (L) Raster plots and frequency histograms of pooled lever press data
preceding the delivery of each pseudoreward (red). (M) Digitized reconstruc-
tion of taD2- and taD1-SPNs after test. Insets: taD2- and taD1-SPN overlapping
territories. (N) Extent of taD2- and taD1-SPN territory overlap (% of D1).
(O)P-H3+nuclei density in D2-SPNs (left axis, purple) and D1-SPNs (right
axis, orange) in the DMS. Left: regions quantified in each group. [(E), (F), (N),
and (O)]: Two hemisections per mouse, eight mice per group; *, overall/simple
effect (black) and interaction (red). n.s., not significant (table S2).RESEARCH | RESEARCH ARTICLE