The Rough Guide to Psychology An Introduction to Human Behaviour and the Mind (Rough Guides)

(nextflipdebug5) #1
THE ROUGH GUIDE TO PSYCHOLOGY

Related to this, there’s evidence that the warnings on cigarette packs
could actually encourage some people to smoke. Jochim Hansen at
Basle University found that smokers who saw their habit as important
to their self-esteem (for example, they agreed with statements such as
“smoking allows me to feel valued by others”) were made to feel more
positive about smoking by death-related warnings on packs than by
neutral warnings (such as “smoking makes you unattractive”). Hansen
argued that this was because thoughts of death can make us seek ways
to boost our self-esteem (an effect explained by Terror management
theory, see p.227), and for some smokers that’s exactly what the act of
smoking provides.


Bedside manner


Traditionally, doctors were expected to assume a “paternalistic”
approach to patients. They were seen as the authoritative expert who
would make your symptoms go away. Today, the ideal doctor-patient
relationship is expected to be far more egalitarian. They are the
experts in diagnosis and treatment, but the patient is the expert on
symptoms and concerns. There’s also a greater emphasis on involving
patients in decision-making – a laudable aim, although many studies
show patients prefer their doctor to take ultimate responsibility for
medical decisions.
Patients do, however, want plenty of information, and countless
surveys have shown that doctors tend to underestimate this. There’s
also often a mismatch between the kind of technical information the
doctor provides – for example, about the disease stage and category


  • and the practical information that a patient seeks (such as degrees
    of pain and the chances of recovery). Thanks to the amount of health
    information available on the Internet, how doctors and patients
    communicate has become a pressing issue, and new research is
    needed to find out the best way forward.
    Striking the right balance in communication isn’t an easy task for
    doctors. If they are over-dependent on medical jargon, patients can
    find it difficult to understand. Conversely, if they are too colloquial – for
    example asking patients to “wee” for a urine sample – they can be seen
    as patronizing. A study published in the early-1990s, by Jan Hadlow
    at the Polytechnic of East London and Marian Pitts at the University
    of Zimbabwe, found that it was the language of psychology-related
    conditions, words such as “depression” and “migraine”, that tended to
    cause the most confusion between doctors and patients – presumably
    because many such terms have everyday meanings alongside their
    medical usage.

Free download pdf