For this, we coinjected zygotes with thePiwi1::
Tfap2-P2A-GFPectopic expression construct
alongside a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) ( 37 ),
targeting the GFP sequence in the transgene’s
mRNA.Injectedembryosandlarvaeremained
GFP-free, consistent with effective transgene
repression by the shRNA (fig. S12). The suppres-
sive effect of the shRNA dissipated ~1 week after
metamorphosis, and transgenic feeding polyps
developed ectopic GFP+oocytes in the gastro-
dermis that appeared morphologically more
mature than ectopic oocytes in larvae (Fig. 5, E
and F). Furthermore, they expressedCnidarian
egg lectin(Cel)—an exclusive early oogenesis
marker ( 38 )—in GFP+cells(Fig.5,GtoJ),which
was undetectable in larval ectopic oocytes. Taken
together, our results show that Tfap2 acts cell
autonomously and is essential and sufficient
to induce germ cell fate inPiwi1+i-cells but not
in differentiated cells (Fig. 5K). Tfap2 acts non–
cell autonomously downstream of germ cell
induction to drive sexual polyp maturation.
The evolution of bilaterian sequestered
germ lines
Tfap2 is a critical regulator of germ cell in-
duction inHydractinia,ananimalthatdoes
not sequester a germ line, as well as in germ
line–sequestering animals, such as mice ( 8 )and
humans ( 39 ).DrosophilaandC. elegansgerm
lines are specified maternally, a mechanism
that is thought to be evolutionarily derived
( 1 ). In mammals, AP2g(encoded byTfap2C)
acts in concert with other transcription factors,
such as Blimp1, Prdm14, PAX5, and SOX17, to
induce germ cell fate in epiblast cells in a
species-specific combination ( 7 , 8 , 40 ). Partners
of Tfap2 inHydractiniaare yet unknown, but,
unlike in mammals, its expression in i-cells—
which are similar to epiblast cells in being
somatic and germ cell–competent—is sufficient
to induce germ cell fate. It has been suggested
that a nonsequestered germ line is an ances-
tral trait in metazoans ( 4 ). Under this hypoth-
esis, a key event in the evolution of bilaterian
sequestered germ lines would have been the
redeployment of the hypothesized ancestral
adult germ cell induction program, which is
still present in extantHydractinia, during
embryogenesis.
A sequestered germ line prevents transmis-
sion of somatic mutations to future genera-
tionsandwasalsoproposedtohelpselectfor
mitochondrial quality in complex bilaterians
with high mutation rates ( 4 ). Why, then, would
clonal animals not sequester a germ line? We
suggest that a sequestered germ line in clonal
animals would be detrimental, exposing them
to the risk of stochastically generating new
clonal individuals that lack germ cells. There-
fore, maintaining uncommitted cells after em-
bryogenesis, which can provide progenitors to
any lineage of somatic cells or germ cells, grants
full developmental potential to new clonemates.
Thismayrepresenttheselectivepressurethat
prevented the evolution of a sequestered germ
line in clonal animals.
DuBucet al.,Science 367 , 757–762 (2020) 14 February 2020 5of6
Fig. 4. Transplantation
of wild-type, alloge-
neic cells into aTfap2
mutant.(A) Experimen-
tal setup. Dashed red
line denotes the interface
between the two
grafted animal colonies.
(B) FemaleTfap2
wild-type, fluorescent
donor feeding polyp.
(C) Recipient mutant
colony, lacking sexual
polyps. (D) The interface
between the grafted
donor and recipient col-
onies (dashed red line),
viewed from above.
Donor-derived cells are
visible in the recipient’s
tissues. They are more
numerous closer to the
interface. (E)Fluorescent,
Tfap2wild-type sexual
polyp of the donor animal.
Oocytes are encircled
by a dashed white line.
(F) Immature chimeric
sexual polyp composed
of donor (fluorescent,
Tfap2wild type) and
recipient (nonfluorescent,
Tfap2mutant) cells.
(G) Mature chimeric
sexual polyp. Oocytes
encircled by dashed line
are exclusively donor-
derived. Animals were pictured live and the red and the green channels representing theb-tubulin::mScarletandPiwi1::GFPreporter transgenes were merged
and false-colored green in (B) and (D) to (G) for simplicity. The blue color in (E) to (G)represents DNA. All 10 grafts that were performed resulted in
induction of sexual polyps in the mutant.
Migration of cells
Tfap2
wild type tissue
Tfap2
mutant tissue
C
D
EF G
A
Tfap2 mutant
recipient
Tfap2 wild type
fluorescent donor
migration
invading
cells
Tfap2 wild type Tfap2 mutant
Wild type fluorescent sexual polyp Young chimeric sexual polyp Mature chimeric sexual polyp
invading
cells
B
200 μm
RESEARCH | RESEARCH ARTICLE