New Scientist - 15.02.2020

(Michael S) #1
15 February 2020 | New Scientist | 31

Don’t miss


Watch
Little Joe stars Emily
Beecham and Ben
Whishaw as emotionally
stoppered horticultural
researchers threatened
by plants more wedded
to life than they are. In
selected UK cinemas
from 21 February.

Listen
The Secret History of
the Future, hosted by
The Economist’s Tom
Standage and Slate’s
Seth Stevenson, explores
the prehistory of some
very modern-sounding
innovations, including the
world’s first cyberattack –
in 1834.

Read
The Magicians: Great
minds and the central
miracle of science
(Faber & Faber) is
Marcus Chown’s hymn
to mathematics and its
supernatural (or at any
rate baffling) ability to
predict truths about the
physical world.
TOP: MONGREL MEDIA

Into the deep


A scary sci-fi podcast about a mission to the
ocean depths has Anne Marie Conlon hooked

Podcast
Down
Definitely Human

WHAT mysteries await in the
unexplored depths of the
ocean? Down, a 24-part
sci-fi podcast, poses this
question as it follows a small
crew on a submarine mission
to explore a newly discovered
ocean trench in the Antarctic.
“The bottomless pit”, as it is
rather unimaginatively named,
is a “gaping hole on the surface
of the Earth” revealed by climate
change. Initial explorations by
probes have gone further than
the deepest depths plumbed
to date – Challenger Deep
in the Mariana Trench, about
11,000 metres. Now a crewed
mission will go deeper still.
Our protagonist is Marion
Straker, a famous marine
biologist who is trying to throw
herself back into work after a
family tragedy. The rest of the
crew consists of a curmudgeonly
sea captain, a chilled-out ship’s
engineer, a chirpy lab assistant
and the anxious ship’s doctor.
Their hugely expensive Virgil
submarine is paid for by the
massive energy corporate

Advantage, in a move arousing
some suspicion among the crew,
although they also wonder
at the cutting-edge design of
the sub with its own artificial
intelligence. The corporate rep
who directs the crew from dry
land is a perfectly pitched
super-keen mouthpiece for the
energy company, from “geeking
out” about having Straker on
board to encouraging the crew
to “keep it bouncy, yeah?”
The sound design is
immersive enough to draw
you in to the world of the show,
and while the dialogue can be
cheesy, knowing references to
“red shirts” (crew members
thought most likely to die in Star
Tr e k were the ones wearing red)
let us know that the show’s
creators aren’t taking
themselves too seriously.
The podcast zips along,
with 10 to 15-minute episodes,
and drops enough hints to keep
you hooked. The characters’
occasionally meandering
conversations about what to
have for breakfast also contain
clues to keep us guessing.
Is the captain right that the
real purpose of the expedition
is for Advantage to figure out
the effects of such a mission
on the crew? What happened
to Straker’s brother? Will the
“adaptive AI” become more of
a sinister force? So far the only
adapting it has done is to move
from calling the captain
“Charlie” to “Captain Charlie”.
Four episodes in, as we are
finally confronted with what
could be our first mysterious
creature from the deep, comes
the biggest question of all:
what’s really down there? ❚

What will a crew find in the
Antarctic depths as they plumb
EYE EM/ALAMY STOCK PHOTO a newly discovered trench?

use of such medicines to curb
what society may see as taboo or
deviant sexual desires, or even
addictions to online pornography.
We learn, too, about the
growing use of illegal drugs
such as MDMA and psilocybin
as a means to help people with
relationship problems. Psilocybin,
the psychoactive substance in
magic mushrooms, is being
explored under strict controls
and supervision by psychiatrists,
alongside other treatments, for
people with post-traumatic stress
disorder, which can be a cause of
relationship breakdown.
There is also a suggestion
from research in mice that
MDMA, also known as ecstasy,
might help to relieve social
anxiety for people with autism.
“We’re not talking about a
chemical utopia where everybody
tries whatever drugs they want,”
says Savulescu. But neither should
individuals have to get a diagnosis
in order to qualify for love drugs
for medicinal purposes, he argues.
“We don’t need to call them
medicinal or recreational drugs,”
says Savulescu. “We can introduce
a third category. We need to
identify the people for whom
they would be genuine welfare
enhancers, not crutches, not
replacements for dealing with the
deep questions in their lives, but
people for whom they would
genuinely improve their lives.”
But this would mean breaking
free of society’s distinction
between legal and illegal drugs.
“Everything is just chemicals,
and whether we decided to call it
medicine or not is largely a social
and value decision,” says Earp.
The authors say they don’t
know if society is ready for this
new approach, to start a new
relationship with drugs as
chemical love enhancers. But
they are happy to matchmake. ❚

Free download pdf