MYTHBUSTERS
CHRIS MIDDLETONIssue 167 | Whisky Magazine 15
RIVERS OF GOLD AND BLOOD
)RU\HDUVULYHUVRIUHYHQXHÀRZHGIURPWD[LQJZKLVN\
I
n Britain, the development of
commercial breweries in the17th century took ale production
out of the home, making it easier forGovernment to monitor and collect
tax at consolidated brewing locations.On the heels of breweries, distilleries
became an even more valuable revenueǤ
β
alcohol tax on the domestic productionof ale was in England during May 1643,
spirits followed in 1663 with a taxon aqua vitae, gin and compounded
English brandy made from malt spirit.Taxes on spirits were the largest
revenue source for English-speakingGovernments until the 20th century.
The manufacture of high-proof spirits atlarge scale premises made the reporting
or gauging through every step fromproduction, bond store withdrawals
to retail sales accountable to thehalf-gallon. Even today, spirits pay
disproportionately higher tax rates thanbeer, wine or cider in most countries.
Two hundred years after distillingentered Europe, Frankfurt-on-Maine
βin 1360 to control unruly drunkenness
induced by the local schnapsteufel,βǤͳͶͻʹ
β
shipments of brandwijn from France
and Germany. The word excise comesfrom the Dutch excijs to tax. The English
β
tax on local ‘aqua vitae and strong
waters’ from December 1663 to fundmilitary expenditure and to pay down
the accruing debt left from the EnglishCivil War (1643 – 1651). Preceding the
liquor excise, the Government began
taxing malted barley, the raw materialfor making ale and malt spirits from
ͳͶͶǤ
duplicated the English 4d per gallon
duty on aqua vitae in January 1664.Once Governments discovered
this lucrative revenue stream, theyregularly tapped into it by increasing
rates of excise and customs dutiesand added fees for distillery licences
from 1688. These rivers of gold helpedunderwrite nearly 200 years of wars.
Between wars, to feed the ambitions of
empire and improve living standards,
Parliaments continued to tax liquor.They also enacted extra duties on the
raw materials targeting malted grains,molasses imports and corn taxes
further enriching the Exchequer’s
Ǥ
won their War of Independenceǡβ
ͳͻͳǡ
brandy to pay down the mounting$52.8 million debt to France and
Ǥǡabolished spirit duties until the War
of 1812 against Britain when dutiesrecommenced from December 1814.
The War won, taxes were removedin December 1817 until the Civil
War forced Congress to legislate the
ͳ ͅʹǤ
ͳ ͅ͵Ǥǡ
ǡ
β
addicted to spirit taxes.
The Western world’s focus inͳͻ
national defence into a euphemisticwar against intemperance by
prosecuting social policies to limitaccess and consumption of alcohol,
leading to countries introducingdraconian prohibitions and limits on
the manufacture and sale of liquor.The enemy was public consumption.
Ironically, it was the massive costsof the First World War that relieved
the public’s tax burden on liquor asWestern Governments legislated a new
suite of taxable domains. Governmentsintroduced personal income and new
company taxes, plus a raft of protectivetariffs, levies, duties and ad valorem
β
Ǥtaxes reduced the ‘stimulant’s or ‘sin
taxes’ (liquor and tobacco) share of theͲ
ͳͻ
century, to around 25 per cent beforethe First World War, to now where
it’s less than half a per cent of mostǤ
tariffs are still small monetary leversthat Governments use to raise small
quanta of revenue, engineer socialprograms and now punish foreign
Governments in trade disputes. Inthe 21st-century whisky tariffs are
Ǯǯβtrade wars in Europe and China.
After the Civil War,
the US Government
KDGEHFRPH¿VFDOO\
DGGLFWHGWRVSLULWWD[HV
015 - ChrisMiddleton-WM 167 .indd 15 09 / 04 / 2020 09 : 18