- Ross claimed that the participants had been told what was
involved, and that risks of the experiments were justified: ‘I think
myself justified in making this experiment because of the vast
importance a positive result would have and because I have a
specific in quinine always at hand.’ (source: Ross, 1923).
However, it is not clear how fully the risks were actually explained
to participants; quinine is not as effective as the treatments used
in modern studies of malaria (source: Achan J. et al., ‘Quinine, an
old anti-malarial drug in a modern world: role in the treatment of
malaria’ Malaria Journal, 2011.) We will look at the ethics of
human experiments in more detail in Chapter 7. - Bhattacharya S. et al., ‘Ronald Ross: Known scientist, unknown
man’, Science and Culture, 2010. - Chernin E., ‘Sir Ronald Ross vs. Sir Patrick Manson: A Matter
of Libel’, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences,
1988. - Manson-Bahr P., History Of The School Of Tropical Medicine In
London, 1899–1949, (London, 1956). - Reiter P., ‘From Shakespeare to Defoe: Malaria in England in
the Little Ice Age’, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2000. - High R., ‘The Panama Canal – the American Canal
Construction’, International Construction, October 2008. - Griffing S.M. et al., ‘A historical perspective on malaria control in
Brazil’, Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2015. - Jorland G. et al., Body Counts: Medical Quantification in
Historical and Sociological Perspectives (McGill-Queen’s
University Press, 2005). - Fine P.E.M., ‘John Brownlee and the Measurement of
Infectiousness: An Historical Study in Epidemic Theory’, Journal
of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 1979. - Fine P.E.M., ‘Ross’s a priori Pathometry – a Perspective’,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1975.
greg delong
(Greg DeLong)
#1